Search results

Yep exactly what I am saying. It will take while to get full benefits of the ban.

I will easily admit when I am wrong. This is a must when trading, for example. So far no one proved me wrong. I have my beliefs and you have yours. It is normal for both of us to defend our positions. Time will tell who is wrong and who is right. Please define a reality that is...

So did my late grand father squad during Ww2. I am sure you were not. I was referring to Bsam comment that came out of trader666 hilarious post. Not many people are naive to believe modern fighter jets can be brought down by rifle shots. Then he continues to make a fool out of himself by...

Come on, you like to talk about facts, and the fact is no plane was ever brought down on us soil via a missile after end of WW2. I can bet we have some people on our soil who would love to do it, yet it is extremely hard if not impossible to obtain a rocket. Imagine if shoulder rockets were...

Yeah, still laughing at a possibility of shooting something like F-16 or F/A-18 at 20,000-30,000 altitude with a rifle. And instead of saying, oops, I just typed before giving it much thought, he keeps defending it with some macho BS.

I agree that certain things just can not be banned. Drugs for example, too many people willing to pay to have whatever enjoying they get out of them. Missiles are banned, and so far so good. Rifles and high capacity clips,who knows? It will take a generation after the ban to clearly see if...

True, but it is a making it extremely hard to get one when it is a serious ban that has been in place for a long time. Serious criminals do not have any intentions of bringing down the planes, psychos have no ways of obtaining rockets. Terrorists who might try to obtain them on black market...

This is one war that government is certainly loosing. If you want we can start another thread on the subject. Btw, when I learned that original ban on drugs had stupid racial motivation for closing opium houses I was shocked. War on drugs started about 100 years ago with no end in sight...

Military will not use these low flying planes for airstrikes. Not sure if they even have any. They mostly use to display banners.

Correct. I just used the word bazooka to identify shoulder fired missiles. So, how many air planes planes have been shot down over US soil after WW2 ended? The ban on such deadly weapons clearly shows that it has a merit and is working as it should.

Well, I would say the odds of that happening will be around the odds of winning a lottery. Bringing down two......

Sorry, this is definitely my last response to you. I just almost fell of my chair when I saw it. Speaking of ignorance. WOW!!! Let me break news to you sport, yes planes from WW1 and some from early days of WW2 could be. I bet anyone who will read this, will think that it is the funniest...

I am done responding to your posts. When people like you have no real arguments to advocate their position all they can do are insults. If you ever were under gun fire, you would them know who scary it is. Bombs are the whole other level. I just greatly simplified how a town can be secured...

Some might have their temper raising, but that's because they are running out of arguments to defend their position. Or take it persoanlly when someone challanges their staus quo. CT tragedy was a wake up call to many. CT law makers biting themselves right now for being cowards and not...

I have given you an intelligent argument why 2nd Amendment allows me to own a bazooka, yet it is not allowed under laws of our land. How is it different if AR15 will no longer be allowed? Both infringe of my 2nd Amendment right.

If bazookas would be allowed, you do realize that there will be civilian planes shot down by psychos. That's why I am making a point that certain weapons should not be in hands of civilians, even though 2nd amendment gives us the right to bear them.

No I have not. One way a town can be secured is by airstrikes destroying about 10-20% of it, the rest will be given a chance of either surrender or death. Most will surrender. Just because the wars are not run this way due to humanitarian reasons, does not mean they can not. The fact is AR15...

You throwing insults with almost each post, clearly shows your level of intelligence. Would love to hear your reason why I am prohibited then from buying a bazooka. I can bear this arms. According to 2nd amendment I have the right to buy it. There is nothing emotional about my posts...

It does happen, thought rarely. I have seen it happening on beretta and sig. It it just very inconvenient to operate a hand gun with a hot slide. Every second counts in these deadly situations. As I have shown to you by your 0.7 examples, studies are often biased and do not show real picture...

:)