Search results

Actually you are: the SLA/AMT. See Appendix B.

It can get wearing, unless one looks at it as a kind of commedia dell'arte sort of thing. Why people become enraged by this nonsense is beyond me.

That must be news to the Fed.

And the creek don't rise.

Again: Since you're so well-versed on the ins and outs of the SLA/AMT: under what conditions does the trader stop trading entirely?

*crickets*

Yep. That's it. Jealous. :)

How nice for you. I'll just take your word for that. :) I hope nursebee sees this. She's looking for something new. 3 times the daily range ought to pass her "sniff test".

Why do you have so much trouble following your own plan?

Again: Since you're so well-versed on the ins and outs of the SLA/AMT: under what conditions does the trader stop trading entirely?

!

Yeah. Those.

Again: Since you're so well-versed on the ins and outs of the SLA/AMT: under what conditions does the trader stop trading entirely?

Audited tax returns. :)

I'll repeat from his other rantfest: Since you're so well-versed on the ins and outs of the SLA/AMT: under what conditions does the trader stop trading entirely?

No, it doesn't. But your "money management" plan makes no sense to anyone who understands simple arithmetic.

No, it is not. It is evidence of an attempt to get people to start thinking about the conditions under which the criteria for the trade are no longer true and whether or not to exit the trade. Dicking around with stops is not the answer. Here's one for you, since you're so well-versed on the...

Which is essentially the point that Magee was making decades ago. What I find most interesting about this "you can make tons of money with a low winrate" business is that it originated with Van Tharp, who was a complete failure as a trader. The low-winrate people simply ignore the...

There are no instructions to take profits at any given level. There are no stops. There is no such thing as "noise". Deaf.

Being the narcissist that you are, you wouldn't.