The Trouble With Scribbles

Reading back through ET history, it would seem a number of the good ones have done just that.

It can get wearing, unless one looks at it as a kind of commedia dell'arte sort of thing. Why people become enraged by this nonsense is beyond me.
 
I saw too many posts by traders that could not easily see the range or had problems understanding why its a range...there own words in the replies about posted charts by the scribble folks here and elsewhere online.
Exactly. The scribbles are extremely arbitrary and different ranges are seen by different folks. In addition, there is no calling of trades in real time. I suspect that this is due to the possibility that the calls will be wrong or that there are no trades. Imagine someone trying to sell you a weight loss product without a testimonial like is seen from Dan Marino or Marie Osmond. Seem like a good idea to buy into something like that?
 
Last edited:
Exactly. The scribbles are extremely arbitrary and different ranges are seen by different folks. In addition, there is no calling of trades in real time. I suspect that this is due to possibility that the calls will be wrong or that there are no trades. Imagine someone trying to sell you a weight loss product without a testimonial like is seen from Dan Marino or Marie Osmond. Seem like a good idea to buy into something like that?

The SLA/AMT is free.

Incidentally, this inability to let something go is characteristic of OCD.

And by the way, the number of views my threads get increases every day you go on with this, so don't let me stop you.
 
Actually it's the absence of woof. Unless of course by using brackets you mean the negative woof - implying the absence of woof - which would be beyond cool.

correct!

my initial response was going to be !=woof but figured that would've gone over many heads.
 
Back
Top