Search results

  1. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    More ad homs and insults from you. You must be getting desperate. Here you go.... In 2003, Hansen wrote a paper called "Can We Defuse the Global Warming Time Bomb?" in which he argued that human-caused forces on the climate are now greater than natural ones, and that this, over a long time...
  2. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    Every expert on earth disagrees with you. No, it is clearly you that is the ignoramus. American Geophysical Union "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can...
  3. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    Still not a single chart. Only ad homs and cartoons.
  4. F

    Poles

    The point is to give alternative sources of energy an even playing field. We are not currently paying the true cost for fossil fuels. There is a hidden cost in the form of climate change expenses that we are asking the future generations to pay. So like many things that are harmful to society...
  5. F

    Poles

    You can read right? From that site....... the idea is reduce CO2 emissions, which are causing the warming. You do understand how greenhouse gasses work right? Revenue-neutral means that government retains little if any of the tax revenues raised by taxing carbon emissions. The vast majority...
  6. F

    Poles

    You seem to have a hard time pretending that you have an IQ above 70. But if you REALLY want to know how it would work ....which you don't.....you just want to make more stupid comments. https://www.carbontax.org/
  7. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    No, rapid, dangerous, potentially catastrophic man made global warming has NOT happened before. Try again ignoramus.
  8. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    Because he accused me of something I did not do. I do not avoid conflicting info. IF IT IS FROM A REASONABLE SOURCE. That's why I said he had sex with sheep. Still no science or charts. Just ad homs. You, jem, gwb....you are all very good at the ad homs, not so good with science or facts...
  9. F

    Poles

    Not a lie at all. Earlier research pointed to that. It still is not totally clear and there is some debate among the scientists. Other studies show ice loss. One thing for sure is that it is NOT getting colder down there.
  10. F

    Poles

    Duh huh yeah. You don't have a clue do you.
  11. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Jem's articles that "deny global warming"....... they do nothing of the kind and may as well be recipes for making soup. Rather than stating clearly that AGW is false, articles on that site “support arguments” and many do not even do that. Just to take one example, the most recent article...
  12. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Let's see just one statement or summary or anything from just ONE of those "climate experts" denying it. We already know all the experts on earth know it's a real problem. All the climatologists. All the science orgs. Exxon. The Weather Channel. Do you even know how insane you sound?
  13. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    GWB : "Oh no look a cliff! I think I'll keep walking!" what an idiot
  14. F

    Poles

    The politicians can set an escalating carbon tax. And no, Gore's house is not on the ocean. No we don't have 83 years.
  15. F

    Poles

    So vote for politicians that that will do something about it. Because it's a big problem for all life on earth. As those science organizations say.
  16. F

    Even the Pope sides with Futurecurrents

    Again, this is complete bullshit you fool. This has been debunked multiple times. Why can't you learn? Just look at the website. What's next, comic books? And OK, let's just say those publishing climate scientists you listed say that man made global is not true. Let's see just one...
  17. F

    Poles

    Read this and then come back and tell that both sides are equally convincing. Because, among the experts there is NO doubt. None. http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/ ^BTW, this is the kind of information the FF interests don't want you to see, so they want to stop NASA from being...
  18. F

    Poles

    You do not seem to know the difference between singular and plural. He said both "caps" note the s on the end. Now let's see the ice gain in the Arctic. Yes we know, Antarctica may be gain ing ice. But it's still warming there. It's a temporary condition due to global warming. Huge ice...
  19. F

    Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

    Yeah OK. Like I thought. All bullshit. You are one fucked-up person.
Back
Top