Trump to scrap Nasa climate research in crackdown on ‘politicized science’

[futurecurrents]

Ha... you would not even get to a trial.

In court, for expert testimony to be admissible it must come from an expert and it must have a strong foundation in proven science.

You not only don't have a preponderance of the evidence. You have none. you have zero datapoints showing man made co2 causes warming. You have not produced a single peer reviewed article showing man made co2 causes warming.

Whereas we have produced 1350 skeptical articles.
http://www.populartechnology.net/2009/10/peer-reviewed-papers-supporting.html

If you try this case in court you would lose before trial at summary judgment. You have no scientific evidence showing man made co2 causes warming.

You just keep on posting debunked bullshit and expect it not to be bullshit this time. And again, great source.

 

[futurecurrents]

Obviously you refuse to read scientific papers and research.

Yes, I have a degree in Env Sci but I never read science.

And when have you EVER presented remotely like that here? LOL

I knew more about science when I was twelve than you do now.

 

[gwb-trading]

Yes, I have a degree in Env Sci but I never read science.

And when have you EVER presented remotely like that here? LOL

An Environmental Science degree is equivalent to a Golf Course Turf Management and Landscaping Degree. In most universities it is not even a degree program that is part of the School of Science and Engineering. Pretty worthless.

Tell us again how you became an HVAC installer with an Environmental Science degree. Were all the jobs at McDonalds taken?

 

[futurecurrents]

An Environmental Science degree is equivalent to a Golf Course Turf Management and Landscaping Degree. In most universities it is not even a degree program that is part of the School of Science and Engineering. Pretty worthless.

Tell us again how you became an HVAC installer with an Environmental Science degree. Were all the jobs at McDonalds taken?

So instead of ad homing the argument. Let's see some charts supporting your postion. You know, on your knees in the men's bathroom stall.

 

[gwb-trading]

So instead of ad homing the argument. Let's see some charts supporting your postion. You know, on your knees in the men's bathroom stall.

You have been provided plenty of material from reliable sources on ET for years. Go back and read them.

P.S. I hope you enjoyed Thanksgiving. We know how you like family get-togethers.

 

[futurecurrents]

You have been provided plenty of material from reliable sources on ET for years. Go back and read them.

P.S. I hope you enjoyed Thanksgiving. We know how you like family get-togethers.

Never a chart or science from a reliable source, never. And when you do, you misintereprate it.

 

[gwb-trading]

Never a chart or science from a reliable source, never. And when you do, you misintereprate it.

This may be a good time for you to go back and read all the links in the posts in the global warming threads from jem, myself, and others..... and educate yourself.

After all you are going to look pretty foolish in 2050 when everyone is freezing their asses off.

This might be a good time to build up the heating system side of your business.

 

[futurecurrents]

This may be a good time for you to go back and read all the links in the posts in the global warming threads from jem, myself, and others..... and educate yourself.

After all you are going to look pretty foolish in 2050 when everyone is freezing their asses off.

This might be a good time to build up the heating system side of your business.

Yeah OK. Like I thought. All bullshit. You are one fucked-up person.

 

[gwb-trading]

Yeah OK. Like I thought. All bullshit. You are one fucked-up person.

 

[futurecurrents]

Still not a chart to be seen.