Search results

There is no "gender-imbalance" issue that requires global solutions. Even hiring women only wouldn't do it b/c it has no practical merits. There is no structural issue in existence of 2 genders. Next time just ask a complaining woman what she wants you to do?

I don't know either. That's why your giving one example does not mean there is some 'structural issue'. What if this is the natural course of events.

So how the situation should be remedied exactly?

LOL! This seems like the man's structural issue. What if her boss is a woman herself? Where is a structural issue there?

Yes, but for that you need investors, not bosses. Aren't they paid commissions depending on their performance in addition to their base salary? I have no idea what you are getting at. Where is structural difference between men & women?

If women are better traders and asset managers why do they need someone to pay them salary? Why would someone decide to pay a talented & highly profitable woman lower salary just b/c she is a woman? What business sense does it make?

What physical constraint for a man to be a registered nurse?

Structural issue? Is it the same structural issue as far less women working in construction industry and more women than men are registered nurses?

I don't think so. The era of equities is coming. They were depressed for too long relative to gold and real estate.

Do you mind to name a few 2) pools which accept non-accredited investors?

This is for accredited investors only, right?

I don't think much has changed b/c companies raising capital don't want to bother with non-accredited investors. Probably b/c there is much more paperwork for them.

You can close it during extended hours.

No need to worry. You are not responsible for broker's reports. Just prepare yourself schedule-D ( based on your own transaction journal ) and explain the discrepancies.

You have a better chance at making money by following experienced traders at collective2.com. But you have to have some savings & pay for the service.

Let me rephrase this: people who are w/ IB for their low transaction cost should be sensitive to the IB's raising their fees somewhere else.

In this case you should be sensitive to the IB's raising their fees.

I guess trading without data is not a big deal for you. Ameritrade is charging $6. OptionsHouse is charging $4.95.

Yes, having account with IB is not a right but a privilege.

Good businesses always strive for bringing the cost down.