Search results

Oh ok. Your pejorative use of 'Russian' against a stated America is not racist. It is merely how strongly you feel against the practice of foreigners, and their agents, coming into US voter-rich social media forums to have an influence in US politics, pretending to be a US voter. What are the...

After a few laughs, maybe we can discuss the difference between legally operating without a licence and legally operating without the legally protected term "university". I wonder if that's the same as giving massage, but not being a licenced massage therapist (LMT).

Ok, so a university is... [drumroll please]

Not sure I should take that as an insult or compliment. I did come up with Mooler, and moooling, without the aid of any Russians.

I could learn to spell if Moooler could learn to prosecute off a solid basis of evidence.

Moolers gonna mool. Don't know. What is a university?

Trade the word British for Russian and you might have a description of the British satirist, exGOPer, whose name appears to be a sniggering dumb-American joke to himself, as he goes full Oliver, pretending to be some kind of ex-US voter, and still elligable. But so far Poindexter has denied...

People start businesses for money. Last I checked all universities are businesses. The desperation factor is speculation. How does your statement about banks, prospective employees, vulnerabilities apply to the current situation? "Trust me" could be a red flag. Currently, aren't we being...

Why would you use that in a pejorative statement? What is the relevance?

Define Russian.

Yah what about this other, completely unrelated complaint. What was all that about whataboutism?

This sounds like the basis of a personal vendetta, possibly included in the obscure motivations of the Mooler-Rosentein vendetta, but unrelated to the allegations at hand.

The record should reflect this is both personal and partisan. The best way to reflect that is for a consortium of persons and partisans to carry the cost. Then if there is any evidence, in a year, that does collar Trump, the guilty party can be sued to recover costs. Meanwhile, not all...

As such, it is an investigation based on inuendo, and is therefor malicious. It relies on bullying everyone and everything around Trump, trying to flip witnesses (witness tampering) with Trump as the target of the singers, or more likely, the composers. The average person would be bothered...

If you were to go back to where you came from, where would that be? Panama? Brittain? Canada? How are these places better than (supreme over) Russia?

If they think they need to redact, then redact during discovery, allowing time for the other party to motion for a lifting of the redaction.

That's just it, while you might see Trump as a bully, many of us see your combined efforts and tactics as a bigger, more unfair bully, currently personified by malicious Mooooler and his malicious prosecution, who is getting revenge for himself (who was turned down FBI Director position), for...

At least then the prosecution would be more transparent, and not the personal vendetta of Rosenstoned (deputy of Jeff "weed" Sessions), who is seeking revenge for having felt used to fire Comey.

Discovery is supposed to eliminate the element of surprise in court. Surprises in court are unfair, like releasing dirt before an election, without enough time for the other candidate to respond. Discovery assures the case is fully litigated, and also increases chances of an out-of-court...

I think the term is 'malicious prosecution'. There should be a law that allows counter-suits based on evidence of malicious prosecution. Meanwhile, the prosecutor should be required to bond up, in case he has to pay for malicious prosecution. That bond should be funded by the interested...