Search results

Cooper: "But sir, with all due respect: That’s the argument of a five-year-old." Trump: "I didn’t start it—no it’s not." Cooper: "The argument of a five-year-old is: 'He started it.' " As spake The Donald , so speak the TrumpETeers.:)

I suggest it's very clear how a greater appreciation of the way and the why superstition evolved develops and works provides a better understanding of religion. Superstition is to nature what religion is to reason. The mad daughters of wise mothers. with apologies to Voltaire

Apparently nitro is reading much more into the vid than is actually being said in it. His stated belief is for a GOD and not God which seems a lot like Odd Trader's Real Jesus Theory and not Jesus. Like a KING ARTHUR or The Real King Arthur Theory, or JOHN HENRY or the Real John Henry...

If you need the threat of eternal damnation to be an honest person, you are not an honest person.

Religion LOL

Not recognizing the substantive difference between origin and evolution is what's horse shit. Nature provides reliable if not always accessible, information for science and computers to predict with. Voters , politicians and too many adults don't.

My thought today would be that your thought today is a good thought. My second thought would be, are you really saying .. like bible jesus for instance? If so my third thought would be you are spot on! Believing in something only for the sake of it leading to a common goodness/wellbeing...

Lol Buddha - the awakened one - doing "egolessness". The irony.

If a person cannot do good deeds or strive to do better without "shooting up on God", then I'd say that's more to do with their own ego - something they fear, want to please, satisfy, impress, feel or whatever, rather than the purpose. To do good itself purely for its own sake, is I would...

Goodness with religion, is a lilly with gilding.

Ancient Chinese proverb says "Wise man requires evidence precede belief to better avoid pigs in pokes."

"Wherever one sees no evidence [...] [one] can find the gap in which to create a Snow White, a Tuner or a Creator."

Wherever one sees no evidence,or indulges in the irrational, can find the gap in which to create a Snow White, a Tuner or a Creator.

Good analogy. Snow White, God (Superman and Spidey too!) .... all mute, until they start to say what their creators, and then their followers, want to hear.

That's fine nitro if you find you need to understand things through the lens of one kind of religion or another. To me religion can only draw a shade on the window you're trying to look out from. Generally confusing everything often unnecessarily. In my humble view, fearlessness, restraint and...

Really? seriously? This is how you've conditioned yourself not to understand and then argue against anything that's said when you don't want to see the glaringly obvious. yeah I did. I also wrote a miracle need only be an amazing natural event. So what. Now you look ridiculous troll theist...

I did do. I said a miracle need only be an amazing natural event. Just another case of your obsession getting in the way of your spelling,reading and comprehending.

In terms of evolutionary adaptation, that would come under the main heading of superstitions.

Incomplete scientific knowledge doesn't mean big bang is anything less than an amazing natural event, or any more of a miracle.

... which are also useful for learning how to write plurals correctly. Obviously as a god botherer, you used the word to mean not explicable by natural laws, while obviously disregarding the same dictionary definitions, that tell you a miracle need only be an amazing natural event. Maybe try...