Search results

well now troll boy, you 're very quick jumping to the defence of your Belief Buddy. Still trying to keep him on track obviously. So your idea of an "ultimate reality" has Jack in the Beanstalk as real then . Oh dear.

jem, has no one told you yet, it' s a fairy story dude. It isn't actually real. You know like Jack and the Beanstalk isn't really true. Get a grip man We are living in the 21st century you know, not the friggin stone age.

Being purposely obtuse really won't help you acheive integrity any . ..... The mud puddle doesn't . So now your "sure looks like design" is nothing more a personal choice of what you decide is and isn't "designed" That something natural in the form of a mud puddle ...

Which has now utterly destroyed your argument for teleology. With all its intricate components ,compounds , particles, minerals and elements , with the molecular complexity of water, the mud puddle doesn't "seem designed in the first place". Here is something complex which a...

..... another c&p essay that "looks like" it might do the job ok, come on,, show the evidence in this so called new paper...just purporting more " exquisite design." does not disclaim "bad design" yes, yes, they would most likely describe cancer as the "ingeniously designed...

It obviously is a question of ID'ists merely marvelling at the design of life.Another ID pseudo argument. This time based upon incredulity. A better understanding of these so called designs. might start with a realization that the 'design' repeatedly falls over time after time, duplicating...

For all to see. Subconciously trying to teach yourself. It's a step.

You got confused and pissed yourself again. According to Teleologist you are wrong . Things by intelligent design are artifacts. and do not originally occur naturally by themselves without the ID additional agent , so you should take that up with him If you can't understand what natural...

Asking yourself daft questions and answering them with daft answers is ..well.. just plain daft. But then you're a troll and a troll is basically daft. You don’t like natural because.. why exactly? You think there is what…something not quite natural about it?

Tele, Why don't you just take a basic mildly critical look through all this cut and paste stuff you rely so much upon Ok Let's look at what he says to look at. Things A) designed through intelligent intervention and things that are B) not designed through intelligent intervention. But...

nor doing anything else much really except trolling around the place

There is no science in ID - aka creationism so It's no more than you might expect Trying to make extravagant claims ( especially in a lecture ) that have no basis in science , to scientists, is pointless and pathetic. A lot like the c&p creationist propaganda you are reduced to. Non of it...

Tele dude, it must be the horseshite you post which keeps the pages of Elite nice and green

Dr Egnor is indeed being succinct. Succinct in his description of how to demonstrate a sheer disregard for knowledge gained. Knowledge which he doesn't hold, but which enables him to be in a position to use terms like..." microbiology, molecular biology, pharmacology, and statistical methods...

bhumburg posted Entry 2971 on March 9, 2007 08:44 PM. ..."Anytime you see comparative medicine, or comparative biochemistry, or comparative pharmacology, or anything comparative, that is evolutionary theory."... ..." But if you can know the reasons ["Darwinian Science"] why the standard...

raise your cut & paste with my copy & paste... bhumburg posted Entry 2971 on March 9, 2007 08:44 PM. " Dr. Egnor knows that he would be required to use glucocorticoids to prevent seizures in many situations in neurosurgery, but they were first tested in humans in 1948 - well after the FDA...

fair start for a hippy jez, why not try again from there dude luv stu

ddunbar Its' early . I'll reciprocate in kind and try to make this double semi quick.... I read through your "boilerplate bookmark” and quite honestly without meaning any disrespect to you at all , in my view there are double standards being played here over two separate points at...

What constitutes valid definition? The answer to that it appears as far as you are concerned , is only a dictionary's , which is being simply too narrow minded in my view. As dictionaries do not predict change of use and contain incomplete definitions, dictionaries are prone to vary and...

I hope you are not being serious. one understanding is all we need!!??... I am misreading an ironical post, no? just in case then… Others may have an agenda to call babies atheist, I do not, so you are absent some information here. That I have an agenda is an accusation made by...