Search results

wild, that actually had the beginnings of a pretty good article - up until the point the writer just had to start rambling on about all he finds distasteful about britain today. he probably thinks he made some profound point too, the liberal jackass; obviously we can go over each and ever...

oh, so you aren't REALLY sure that we can't know anything then? it's not an immutable 'fact' of reality then? that would make it possible to know something... COOL! :)

i would ask the same thing to you: how do you "know" that we cannot not "know" anything if not by deduction?

well i hope you're not classing ME in that category candles.. i'm well aware that US foreign policy needs to work with our western friends to preserve and proselytize our way of life :) note: i don't include an unprovoked attack on iraq as good policy to that effect.

TF before you go and make your routine accusations of me spreading 'propaganda', WHAT THE HELL DO YOU CALL THAT LAST ARTICLE YOU (again, routinely) CUT & PASTED??? btw, i noticed a similar phenomenon in california... all the hotties there going ga-ga over the idea of wrapping themselves in...

hey TF ! did i EVER claim the 'macedonian' way of life was the same as the 'western way of life' ???????????? you freakin ****. the macedonian way of life is RUBBISH!!. (but it still shits on anything the muslims can offer up.) and just to make it clear, when i talk of the western way of...

dude, read this very carefully: for you to be able to make the claim: "we cannot know anything" there has to be SOMETHING there to do the 'knowing'. something. ANYTHING. even if this universe is like the matrix or any other crazy idea that is nothing like what we'd commonly refer to...

rs7, candle's various assessments of world political situations and possible consequances are so far off the mark they barely show up on the radar. he's obviously got some emotional hang up about the west that he'd do much better spending time to justify to the rest of us rather than waste his...

i thought that one would raise a few eyebrows :) do u realize what i meant by "if the situation arose"? have a think about it. in such a situation, i would be more than willing to, happy, in fact, to fight - yep, take lives - to preserve the western way of life. obviously if cockroaches...

well candle, this post has finally confirmed for me that you are first class cockroach. with americans like you, who the hell needs enemies. personally, if the situation arose, i'd be glad to legally place a bullet into your forehead. :) there are man things i dislike about US foreign...

yeah, great season all. what a turn up for the books in the play off race! uptik with the late season run and vulture, rank outsider, sneaking in by the skin of his teeth! it's anything-can-happen time now... so i'll probably get blown out this week. all the best to whoever wins...

personally, i'm proud of the fact that trading is good for me, ME, ME!

LOL. not a chance. why in the world should i accept the testimony coming from another man - which is what "a religion's holy writings" are - based on nothing more than his assertion that "god told me"??????? there is absolutely no rational justification for believing those writings...

confused? it seems you are. "the only thing you can know is that you know nothing, except for knowing that you can know nothing." it's still a contradiction. in any case, it's even it wasn't a contradiction, we can still know something else. we know that existance exists. ie, we...

yeah, that was a nice article that i can relate to. i, personally, don't find trading all that 'exciting' though. i find it challenging and satisfying but i very seldom ever get excited about it.

Baloney. You have completely failed to substantiate this claim. How could you possibly know that YOUR prayers are more powerful than someone praying to Vishnu? How could you possibly know that? you couldn't. you just have to ask us to believe you. well, sorry, i don't. and to those...

you know, if you wanted me to, i could... well, i couldn't actually PROVE it, but i could certainly offer rational evidence that suggests that, yes, i had in fact loved.

do you know why i say that inandlong? because it's the ARGUMENT that does the convincing. not ME. i am totally convinced that my argument against christianity - in its entirety - presents a compelling REASON not to believe the claims of christianity. it's not a conclusive argument, but it...

how disheartening - not to mention tiring - it is to hear a has-been like you chime in with your apathetic views on everything. (and yep - i'm well aware a similar accusation could be levelled at me :) i just couldn't resist taking a dig at ole tampax.)