Wow Dan, a little harsh today, no?Quote from daniel_m:
well candle, this post has finally confirmed for me that you are first class cockroach. with americans like you, who the hell needs enemies. personally, if the situation arose, i'd be glad to legally place a bullet into your forehead.
Is Candle an American?
I have been (rightly) criticized for rising to the bait of Max401. Here, Dan, it seems like you are rising to some pretty outrageous baiting as well. I know little of Candle. Other than he has made some very sensible observations (not necessarily on these matters) and has posted some really impressive stuff, assuming they were his words, which I trust they were. (the letter from Castro comes to mind...a great piece that I am pretty sure came from Candle....).
And then there is you Dan. Just possibly the brightest guy on all of ET. (maybe a little young with some maturing left to follow, most assuredly). But you sometimes even put even my unreasonable, temper twisted responses to shame. A bullet in the head? Come on!
My take on Candle, which could be completely off base, is that he went form one extreme to another in his political beliefs (at least that is what my somewhat addled brain seems to recall). If this is the case, well you know how recent "converts" to new ideologies tend to be the most radical. I am sure that when Candle's new found enthusiasm (if this is the case) dissipates, as it surely will, more reasonable and balanced thinking will replace his temporary fanaticism.
Global Islam? Come on. This can't be the real aspiration of any right thinking American (assuming Candle is). Because it is contrary to the beliefs he himself seems to endorse. And this is not specific to Islam, obviously. It is contrary to any belief in freedom and tolerance and reason. Which are principals I believe Candle really does hold dear.
Candle seems to want things that are (to him) wrong to be corrected over time. Yeah, he has valid points that Bush and Co. have gone over the edge in their quest for un-needed conflict. But to seriously propose "global Islam" as a solution? I am certain he is not serious. (Hope so anyway).
Candle is perhaps guilty of overstating his case. I doubt seriously that he intended to be taken literally. If he did, a bullet would not help. De-programming would be more the ticket. And if he is just trying to be provocative, well he has a great audience....where better to be as outrageous as possible than here? Especially with our pal TF to cheer him on. And I KNOW that TF is not really that unreasonable. TF uses exaggeration to make his points like we all do. (not to mention an unreasonable amount of cutting and pasting, but that is a whole other issue, and personal beef of mine which I have expressed too many times). My only real beef with TF is that he continually uses examples from the past that are totally irrelevant to today's world as far as Islamic "tolerance". Leaches and bloodletting had their day. Witch hunts had their day. Flat earth theory had it's time. So did the great societies of Islam. Today? Where are the peaceful proponents of Islam? Here we go again!
Either way, I find it virtually impossible to accept that Candle is attempting to be taken literally. Guy seems too bright. As do you. And yet look at some of your comments. I KNOW you don't want to kill anyone for expressing a belief (which, in this case, I don't believe to be his real belief). So, by making your statement, it seems obvious to me that neither of you truly meant what you said. Both of you are guilty of exaggeration and nothing more.
Peace,
rs7