Search results

- on degap Here is what Jack says about it : What I understand here, and to me it is clear : when one degaps, one moves n-1 bar and ALL of this bar. What this "ALL" must mean ? I don't see how it could mean anything other than "all the information contained by bar n-1". Then, in the...

Full MADA on 07/01/19 & Log, part 2 Well... I notice most of time, when on my logs the three arrows do line up, it leads to a loss. There must be then, something I need to refine to arrive to something consistent. I'll take a little break for now, and then I'll produce another post...

Refining some inconsistencies as for BM's in previous Log

Full MADA on 070119 & Log, part 1

The day has been huge. I have experienced unknown feelings along time was passing. I have several things to discuss, refine, re-ID etc. AND I feel great that I did what I did. Really. I feel both excited and really calm. So balanced. See you tomorrow, best wishes to all of you

Full MADA on 06/28/19 annotated Chart & Log, part 5- 1&2

Full MADA on 06/28/19 annotated Chart & Log, part 4

Full MADA on 06/28/19 annotated Chart & Log, part 3

Full MADA on 06/28/19 annotated Chart & Log, part 2 Made-me-sweat zone from 11:40

Full MADA on 06/28/19 annotated Chart & Log, part 1 Edit : of course the last trend type has a typo ^^

Full MADA on 06/27/19 & Log, part 5

Here is a refinement and re-ID on the made-me-sweat zone. I had forgotten to prior squish.

Full MADA on 06/27/19 & Log, part 4 From 15:10, I began to sweat and went through (surely erroneous) DD.

Full MADA on 06/27/19 & Log, part 3

Therefore, if I consider no rtl can be built inside a Lat, the only reference as for FS that can be used is BM. AND If I consider PP2 and PP3 are not killed by INT when in a LAT AND If I consider PP6 is killed by INT even if in a LAT This is where I arrive : Let's stick to that and...

Where did you find this differenciation as for "BUT not for laterals" ? I don't see it in my PP! sheet. I'll go with it for the refinement of last snipppet and see what it leads to.

Being as we're not in my native language, I need more precision, maybe more words. Even in my language, shortcuts could be yielding fuzzyness. That's the way I understand what you said : -NOT FS or a Band, PP4-> P1 ass next bar = "if there is no FS nor any Band active, then the surge of PP4...

I'll comment this later, thanks a lot for your reactivity

I realize now I was not precise enough in my comprehension, being as the "internal kills" sounded more than anything like "Wait kills". Wait and INT are not the same, although all wait are INT. Thank you Tiddly!!! The second Lat begins ASA the first one ends.