Making JH' SCT and all his material alive

[Simples]

It's not that obvious for me to understand what you state here, but nevertheless it does provide a helpful path. Thank you very much.
I'll continue my log with what I understand and see what happens.
Discussing and refining in team is beginning to appear great to me nowadays

DD comes later, often after first night if with good sleep. Even wrong opinions, Dd should self-correct.

 

[WchPl]

I'll continue my log with what I understand and see what happens.

 

[Simples]

View attachment 205222

NOT FS or a Band, PP4=>P1 ass next bar
RTL not started in Lat.
P1 assigned yields BM

 

[tiddlywinks]

PP6...
Internal Kills = Yes

A question to ask in the example, when did the second lateral spring to life?

 

[WchPl]

PP6...
Internal Kills = Yes

A question to ask in the example, when did the second lateral spring to life?

I realize now I was not precise enough in my comprehension, being as the "internal kills" sounded more than anything like "Wait kills". Wait and INT are not the same, although all wait are INT.

Thank you Tiddly!!!


The second Lat begins ASA the first one ends.

 

[WchPl]

NOT FS or a Band, PP4=>P1 ass next bar
RTL not started in Lat.
P1 assigned yields BM

I'll comment this later, thanks a lot for your reactivity

 

[tiddlywinks]

I realize now I was not precise enough in my comprehension, being as the "internal kills" sounded more than anything like "Wait kills". Wait and INT are not the same, although all wait are INT.

Correct. Further confirmation of the INT/WAIT differentiation can be seen with EE's PP2 & PP3. Both are specified internal kills = yes, BUT not for laterals. We also know laterals of 4 bars or more have no waits. Internal means the bar form/formation. The bar form/formation may or may not have a status of wait.

Good job!

 

[WchPl]

I'll comment this later, thanks a lot for your reactivity

NOT FS or a Band, PP4=>P1 ass next bar
RTL not started in Lat.
P1 assigned yields BM

Being as we're not in my native language, I need more precision, maybe more words. Even in my language, shortcuts could be yielding fuzzyness. That's the way I understand what you said :

-NOT FS or a Band, PP4-> P1 ass next bar = "if there is no FS nor any Band active, then the surge of PP4 assigns a P1 to the next bar"

-RTL no started in Lat = "no RTL can be started inside a Lat, one must wait the Lat to be BO" And even there, I see a differenciation to make : functional or technical BO ?

- P1 assigned yields BM : that is clear.


Am I correct in my way of understanding what you stated ? I'll refine last snippet with what I say I understand here, and see what happens.

 

[WchPl]

PP2 & PP3. Both are specified internal kills = yes, BUT not for laterals.

Where did you find this differenciation as for "BUT not for laterals" ?
I don't see it in my PP! sheet.
I'll go with it for the refinement of last snipppet and see what it leads to.

 

[WchPl]

Therefore, if I consider no rtl can be built inside a Lat, the only reference as for FS that can be used is BM.

AND

If I consider PP2 and PP3 are not killed by INT when in a LAT

AND

If I consider PP6 is killed by INT even if in a LAT

This is where I arrive :

Let's stick to that and continue MADA