Search results

You mean like a wall?

Hitlary Clampdown gave a speech yesterday saying you can't take anything for granted and you have to keep the peddle to the metal to the end. Almost like talking directly to you Stark. You've really been slacking off with only 7% threads started compared to Nitro 38%. Need to get those...

Killer bees have problems!

Will find out soon as FBI presents its case. So far, we only know that Lynch uses intelligence to speak slyly, slipperly, and smoothly.

He needed a warrant to be able to assert with certainty. His announcement was what he thought he needed to do to get the warrant. Prior to that there's no way he can pretend to be certain, although he may be.

Nitro, pictured above, would agree with me that unless he forgives like Jesus, then he can't be called a brother. But Nitro could be called whatever it is that you call someone who latches on to the legend, associates with it, and pretends to respect it...and then betrays the essence of the...

Here's the thing, no one would be able to convict Comey of anything without convicting Hellrary of everything.

As Trey Gowdy pointed out, it would be hypocritical if Obama were to come out against Comey, as Obama is a President out campaigning for a candidate. How does that not violate the same Hatch Act? Second, I hear Obama is secretly miffed with Comey. So this is a public face, kind of like Hillary...

I can't believe that Kanye West dumped Kim to go back out on tour when she needs him!

So you are hoping more people will bet on Trump so the bookies odds approach more of a 1:1 payout. Meanwhile, since you are sure Hildebeast's real chances are more like 75/25% that would be more of a slam dunk...or at least better than flipping a coin? And that's the bet you would take?

I've explained in the prior thread (before you started these two new threads) how your risk to reward is 1/1...given true odds. That's why I'm still wondering how come you haven't backed up all your advice/predictions with any of your own money? Here's where I explained it...

Given a 1/1 risk reward ratio, and the advice above, shouldn't you now be willing to put money down on a bet for Hiliarly?

What is the standard? And by that standard, how is the Koran not hate speech?

On the other hand, if the odds are not TRUE, and don't reflect reality, then it could be said that "the odds are too high", which is what you said. But is that what you meant...that the betting odds don't truly reflect Killary's actual chances, on the ground, at the ballot boxes? If so, then...

So let me break this down so it's infinitely clear. First, let's back the bookies take out of the equation. If odds are set correctly, and do reflect reality, then you can bet an underdog or a favorite every day, even every hour of the day, and at the end of the year your balance will be...

For that to happen your runner would have to drop to a 40-45% chance of winning because you have to figure in the bookies take. At which point you are betting on an underdog. So you are saying you would never bet on a presidential favorite...even though favored to win? You do understand that...

Are you saying you would only bet on a longshot that pays out more than your bet? Or, are you saying you never bet on a favorite? I'm just trying to figure out why, in a trading forum, you don't have money behind your advice?

So with better odds wouldn't that be a good time for you to bet on Hillary? But if you have no skin in the game I would remind everyone that Kanye West has gone back out on tour leaving Kim alone to recover from the 10 million dollar jewlery robbery all by herself! On the other hand, the tour...

That would be the perfect time to lay a bet down on her. So even if you bet $1 to get back .20 it's still a good bet right? She IS going to win isn't she? So if you side with the polls, the odds will always give you back less than you bet. And for that reason you are not betting?