Search results

The period you reference was a retrace of a down trend (dec. black to the yet to be established RTL). Also, the bar was an FTT (also and IBGS), but the next bar was also an IBGS that became an Outside bar. There was a sentiment shift in the (11:20?) bar that reversed the previous down sentiment...

Rolled out of bed a wee bit late today :p

May we trade in interesting times :p

Fake Money. Real Stocks. Inspectd.com allows you to test your stock market skills against the toughest competitor there is - the stock market itself. Here's how it works: we show you a random chart from the past, and you try to guess whether the stock rose or dropped. We'll even give you...

Whew!

Are you calling me a "trading whore?" Alright, I guess I am a trading whore :D :D but I can't help myself :p

It has come to my attention that some of the bars labeled as IBGS on my posted chart are in fact mislabeled. In particular the 12:25 and 14:50 bars. One of the qualifications for an IBGS is for the bar to have a minimum of two ticks in the direction of the existing / dominant trend. These bars...

:p

Thanks Spyder, but most of the credit for improvement belongs to the taskmaster Avi8 :p

I hope I wasn't too careless with marking the IBGS :D

My friend Pepe is correct, the first circled bar is mislabeled as an IBGS and is indeed a spike bar :p . So sorry :( .

Hey, I'm not responsible for correctly annotating charts...am I? :D . Ezzy, I have each one of those bars marked IBGS as initially moving in the direction of the current trend (either Dominant or Non-Dominant [i.e. in a retrace at the 14:15 bar) and then reversing and closing opposite their...

It is nice to know I wasn't wrong at the moment I drew the channel :p , however, in reviewing the chart at EOD; the four bar lag between the selected PT3 and the arrival of increasing Volume did not appear to confirm the PT3 at the point I drew it.

Mephisto, That attempted channel was not supported by the Gaussians as drawn. -guava

I must have had some bad java or something :eek: , that large orange down channel on my posted chart is totally bogus.

:)

Take two :p

touche :)

One seriously interesting day :p

Padawan, This is news to me. Flaws only occur in the Dominant trend, I haven't put my considerably small brain to the task of seeing whether Pennants follow that dictum or not , but I suspect they will be in the Dominant trend as well. Please correct Guava if he's wrong.