Search results

Or possibly creating/replicating a position in the options market ? It is because of these inconsistancies/variables that I loose my confidence in volume as a leading indicator as many adhere to. @Sprout ..maybe you can comment. I guess my problem with volume is how do you establish the true...

@zdreg....please read jackrab's post. A couple of times.

If this view is correct (which I think it very well maybe, so does MS) how do you see the "next lost decade" play out volitility wise ? Thanks

What ? I think RM was just explaining how X- div works on a practical basis. I don't think he was expounding on the OP critical thinking abilities.

You are a joke. Would love to see your definition of a "fine women" that you "own". LOL. But as they say ignorance is bliss. Edit: sorry have to continue...I'm far from a feminist, but if your posts are indictitive of your intellectual capacity you really are too ignorant to trade. Even more...

...?.. Is that in reference to Soros shorting the pound ? Or other big FX trades ? If so, that is not interfereing with anyone's affairs, it is trading in the free markets. If not, Ignore my response.

Ok, but the obvious question is, and I'm not trolling, how many of crosses of this type in totality just reversed leading to whip saws. Again, serious question, do you have the data, I don't.

That brings up the next issue...your tail risk fund, vehicle, whatever, has to "perform as advertised" when the time comes. Many did/do not. (Not saying TAIL will not).

If you did not have stops on after readin NT you need to work on your reading comprehension.

You really are out to lunch...this is a public forum ! If you don't want responses talk to yourself in the mirror. Here you go....BTC is great..BTC is great...repeat to mirror. No wonder you have lost your shirt. Here is another little mantra you may want to try repeating....STOP LOSS....I...

This post illustrates how clueless the original BTC fan club was/is on the relationship between asset classes. You are trying to equate a transaction to assigning a value. It is not ironic it is totally irrelavant.

Really...to who's benefit ? Why would the trader want you to know ?

....and your accountant passes this info along to you ? Why ? You implied you know the identity of the trader, from your source, the accountant. Who is breaking various ethical standards of his profession if not the legal standards. This is BS one level or the other. Oh, 13 posts.

Neither followed NT strategy too closely. Actually a point of debate how involved with Universal he even was.

The thing of the 1% positioning is that you have to have either big winners or a very high percentage of winners to move the needle on your overall portfolio, don't you ??

You are obviously a fan, that's fine the guy has a lot going on. But as far as financial expert/ successful trader.....if you followed his tail risk philosophy starting this month he is a genius. If you followed him from 2012-2017 you are probably bancrupt.

His philosophy as a overall investment strategy I am not a fan of. His philosophy in general, I think I've taken a few useful points from. One being, if a trade is not working, you do not need to know why it is not working. Just that is not working and get out. As I mention I thought Fooled...

These axis are irrelevant as shown. Implication are therefore the same.

@Xela. As a financial advisor (professionally) as well as an active trader (personally) I always consider the risk-return characteristics of such a strategy as opposed the traditonal long term investment models...blah blah blah. Alas...compliance/regulatory issues would never allow me to...

...good to see that political correctness hasn't totally taken over the world.