Search results

this. so. this.

ok :)

in my opinion brooks is a charlatan.

With excuses.

Why don't you volunteer audited statements to back up posted performance? I promise I will be satisfied if they reflect what you post as performance on your website.

Hmm yeah, we'll see how the fund does. Hopefully, it will be forced to release audited performance. If it does poorly, I think his next excuse will be "yes, but it's because of liquidity issues" or "we're using different strategies in the fund", etc.

Klaiman still hasn't explained why he won't release audited statements. As far as statements containing irrelevant additional information that can be easily redacted. As far as I'm concerned the performance posted on his website is more likely bogus than not.

I just received the following PM. Hey, pursuit. My name is Iris Mittenaere. You might have heard of me. I am Miss Universe 2016. Even though I've never seen you I could tell by your writing that you're an extremely attractive young man. Let me cut to the chase. I want you in me.

To quote Emmett of tradingschools.org: "The top 10, most common excuses that I hear from trading signal providers regarding account statements is as follows: I cannot provide proof because it’s against the law. (It’s not) I switched brokers recently and I cannot access my old account...

Most fraud rooms claim the same shit Klaiman is Klaiming: we have live signals, come see for yourself and here's our record. If they're unlucky enough to get pounded in the ass by CFTC or SEC all of that turns out to be bogus. In my opinion, without audited statements there's no reason to trust...

may krishna godbless buddy bro

Klaiman, why won't you provide audited statements?

what if I can only take directional bets on the underlying?

No one forces you to read or participate in this thread. Baron does not have a responsibility to vet anyone anymore than your local newspaper or a TV station. He's just a content publisher monetizing via ad revenue.

If I know what realized (as opposed to implied) volatility will be in the future what benefit does that provide to me?

I largely agree and it's largely because you never made a substantial point. Nonsense. So how come you refuse to provide audited statements Mr. Real Trader? Makes me think you're a scammer too.

Yeah, because scammers never put false returns on their websites. Why isn't yours audited? Audited statements is the ONLY way to see who is a real trader. It's super sad to see a vendor say that it's "very easy" to see if someone is a real trader and then refuse to provide audited statements...

I asked you for statements and now you say this: "P.S. I am not a hedge fund and don't need to provide audited statements." So apparently, it's not "pretty easy", is it? The range of 95%-99.99% is pretty solid. Officially scientific? No, but empirically solid. People like tradingschools.org...

Anything with "neo" or "wave" in it sounds legit to me.

Nonsense. You can dispute the % but the question of the thread is clearly addressed to scammers. Yet you chose to answer it. Hmmmm. Few bad apples? Few? You can't be taken seriously after making this statement. Scammers are 95%-99.99% of the "industry". Your inadequate reaction to this thread...