Search results

Actually, I have looked for YM to lead NQ, without success. If you read my Objections posts, you know I think it is the height of foolishness to look for a leading indicator, for if that leader were so reliable, you should trade IT instead. NQ leads NQ.

SCT NEEDS belittling! It is bloated!

Spydie, the trade was a long at 11:16. I have the sort set for last trade first. Again, times Pacific. Optionpro007, you hurt my feelings! My chart is a work of art. Much voudoun, man! You doan blieve? Check da helper at da bottom.

Thanks, Spydie. Now that we know my method works as well and is simpler, I'll just give you your calls. BTW, what you so innocently annotate as an HVS was a gut-wrenching 30 minute consolidation that probably shook out most people who took my trade. I I didn't have some mojo voudoun, I would...

Dear Jack, if by "Conventional Orthodoxy", you mean Classical 1930's TA, I'm having some. Did you see the NQ trade I posted today that used ONLY Classical TA to do what your convoluted method does? No stretch marks, no Dumb, just price and volume. Well, plus a little Hypostomean voudoun.

I think there is ample evidence that Spydertrader can trade them profitably. However, I don't want to try to learn or use a method so fucking complicated that it takes a genius like him to learn it. I am slipping into a pre-Alzheimer's state and have to use classical TA as old as Jack, but not...

Spydie, are you saying the same trade occurred in YM and ES?

Straight out of Schabacker, 1930. Times Pacific.

Stalk? Attack? I'm ADVERTISING for him! When the current group of newbies has lost thier milk money trading, SOMEBODY has to be left here to help Jack reel in the next batch. Don't you think people are attracted to him BECAUSE we rag on him?

Agreed. In this case, the trade was straight out of Richard Schabacker's 1930 book showing how to pick tops and bottoms based on price and volume alone. Jack's "guasians" are a brazen bastardization of that method.

A funny link! Now I remember it. I tested some of the ideas without success. Of course my contention has always been that individual instructions must work independently if the whole system is to work.

Sorry, guys, I have defected. I posted this trade on Spydie's thread to show them how it's done with real money, hahaha!

666, speaking for myself, I KNOW I need help. Fortunately over the years Jack has been very generous with his very personal psychological advice to me, as have some VERY ugly members of the A-Team. Once I started making money consistently, however, I quit giving a shit.

That's ugly! What parts of your list of parameters do those test results encompass? I would have posted some of my old tests, but they are long gone, tossed with the three 3" ring binders, haha!

I spoke to Senator Dole last week in DFW airport and he looks quite hale and hearty.

Permit me a comment, as I once implemented this idea in NQ. The fundamental problem is that premium rises as price rises, and premium falls as price falls, all very slowly. Therefore your approach of periodically adjusting the offset is weak at best, and at worst masks the more subtle changes of...

I am sure he doesn't exist, because he never answers my PMs.

Will it work on NQ? I don't brag about it, but I make 3X the daily range trading SCT on NQ. It is absolutely astonishing to see YM lead NQ, even though they have only one stock in common! Could you also add some ka-ching! cash register sounds for all that money I'll be making? I think it is...

If Jack weren't here I would be reduced to mocking the preening fatuosity of newbies. He is ultimately a much more satisfying target because he has the intellectual horsepower and life experience to be able fight back.

As a general answer to the question "Why do they waste their time?", for myself I can only answer "Because it's fun!" I think it is for Jack, too, because he has made some long posts during RMH when I would have thought he should be monitoring the market. Unless he writes that rambling...