Why was the "Objections to SCT" thread closed?

I'm sure it does "beggar belief" in your tiny pea brain. Tell you what, moron, please put me on iggy... I'd hate for you to bust a gut trying to understand it.
Quote from Bitstream:

u both need help. i too think the guy might be a fraud and he has all the attributes of an imposter, no doubt about that, regardless it beggars belief how dedicated u are to stalk and attack the man...i mean, what it is in it for you. that's all am saying.
More...
 
Thanks, Spydie. Now that we know my method works as well and is simpler, I'll just give you your calls. BTW, what you so innocently annotate as an HVS was a gut-wrenching 30 minute consolidation that probably shook out most people who took my trade. I I didn't have some mojo voudoun, I would have given up myself.
 
Spydie, the trade was a long at 11:16. I have the sort set for last trade first. Again, times Pacific.

Optionpro007, you hurt my feelings! My chart is a work of art. Much voudoun, man! You doan blieve? Check da helper at da bottom.
 
I don't think so. Why are you always trying to belittle SCT? As Jack says:

"SCT usues a paradigm that is related to pool extraction and is effected by using three skill based approaches: effectiviness, efficiency and optimization. To do these kinds of things conventional platforms and screen displays are not possible."

Eagerly Awaiting His Continued Tutelage,

Pool Extraction Paradigm Fan Club

Quote from hypostomus:

Thanks, Spydie. Now that we know my method works as well and is simpler, I'll just give you your calls.
More...
 
Quote from hypostomus:

Thanks, Spydie. Now that we know my method works as well and is simpler, I'll just give you your calls. BTW, what you so innocently annotate as an HVS was a gut-wrenching 30 minute consolidation that probably shook out most people who took my trade. I I didn't have some mojo voudoun, I would have given up myself.
More...

You should continue to use whatever methods make you money. I have no idea what 'signals' you use to make your trading decisions. However, I find it very interesting your particular example shows the YM leading the ES which then leads the NQ. Coincidence? :D

- Spydertrader
 
Actually, I have looked for YM to lead NQ, without success. If you read my Objections posts, you know I think it is the height of foolishness to look for a leading indicator, for if that leader were so reliable, you should trade IT instead. NQ leads NQ.
 
Good thing they deleted my trade post from Spydie's thread. It must have been embarrasing that more people looked at my attachment than at any other in that thread today. Poor babies, desperate for some novelty!
 
Quote from hypostomus:

Actually, I have looked for YM to lead NQ, without success. If you read my Objections posts, you know I think it is the height of foolishness to look for a leading indicator, for if that leader were so reliable, you should trade IT instead. NQ leads NQ.
More...

You misunderstand the definition of the words. Assuming 'leading indicator' to represent 'leading on every tic' attaches meaning to a location where previously none existed. Understand when the YM leads, and more importantly, when to go and look, and you'll find the answers you seek.

Quote from hypostomus:

Good thing they deleted my trade post from Spydie's thread. It must have been embarrasing that more people looked at my attachment than at any other in that thread today. Poor babies, desperate for some novelty!
More...

Now, you simply know this assertion to be false. Nice effort though. :D :D :D

- Spydertrader
 
I thoroughly enjoy debating with you because we have such radically different viewpoints. For example, where you make a periodic adjustment to offset, I made a continous one using adaptive signal processing techniques.

And supreme egotist that I am, I checked the stats. Before my post was deleted, 49 had looked at my attachment and 45 at your daily ES attachment.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top