Search results

Are anyone allowed to buy a private insurance instead? Why should people pay more for goods/services, if they produce more goods/services? You think there should be a free lunch for some people, right? "An interview on the US health care crisis with Dr. Mary Ruwart...

Are there no limits, can everyone get more than they produce, there has to be a balance, one can`t get more than one produces/receives in charity. Well somone will be getting more than they pay for tomorrow, and it will not be charity, but extortion. Public schooling, roads, healthcare are...

What`s everybody`s best interest? Private insurance could sell you the insurance you want/need(free market), if the government would let them/you make that deal. Is that a joke, what has the government ever delivered as promised? I would prefer to enter into an agrement both I/the insurance...

Do they have healthy lifestyles? The europeeans, canadians and japanese are waiting/dying in line! Why should health insurance be attached to employment, why not the person in question? Why should health insurance be attached to employment, why not the person in question? Why have they entered...

The government will confiscate the fruits of your labour, whether you`re represented or not. A private insurance company in a free market, that does not provide what you`re demanding, will lose your business to someone who offer a better product!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K0Crxm4deDM

"An interview on the US health care crisis with Dr. Mary Ruwart, http://www.ruwart.com. Mary J. Ruwart, Ph.D. is a former pharmaceutical research scientist and Assistant Professor of Surgery. She has worked extensively with the disadvantaged in low-income housing and was a contender for the 1992...

Update

...equals mediocrity etc?

What`s your problem?

How do you neutralize global warming? Rationality/facts/, not populism/central planning/collectivism/totalitarianism/authoritarianism/statism/corparatism etc

Libertarian Party

And exponential growth is a viable option?

Who benefits more from useful idiots, collectivists or individualists(elections/herd mentality etc)?

Man has glimpses of knowledge, i.e. man can only guess and make mistakes, i.e. man does not have all the facts, only a fraction of them. But man is not all-knowing?

Yes, disease is natural, and why is that? And how can it be neutralized? And what if all of this will result in more power to politicians/spacial interest etc at the expense of individuals?

Is there a limit to what the "tyranny of the majority" can do(make laws etc/redistribute etc)?

Statistiscs is a cornerstone of freedom? or the centrally planned authoritarian/totalitarian collectivist system/society`s tool/weapon of choice?

Self defence against the government/it`s supporters.

Are statistics a blessing? Are there no reasons to be sceptical?