Why Climate Change is Natural

Quote from crash n burn:

mankind knows more or is at a point it can "control and guide" mother nature

i.e. the DNA is one good example of mankind achievements regarding the topic in question.

so, global warming should be addressed for the sake of the planet stability in terms of hosting life. we should not allow another stone age or something as disturbing as that, whenever we're able to avoid it.

Is the planet unstable?

Was the stone age a result planet instability?

How do you know what should be avoided?
 
the oil industry is behind the conspiracies about climate change being an hoax.

just read between the lines

there is lots of money/power being transferred as countries agree to cap emissions and fossil fuels enter the road of demise that will dramatically change the face of the earth in the next 5 decades.

this shift wont be implemented without major struggles and many backstage maneuvers that will attempt at any cost sabotage the shift towards cleaner energies.

more taxation would occur in any case, some one has to pay for the deforestation of amazonia, pollution of seas and many other crimes that have destroyed much of out beloved planet.

it is time to defend what remains of it.
 
Quote from Mnphats:

Is the planet unstable?

Was the stone age a result planet instability?

How do you know what should be avoided?


well i know stone age wiped out most of the life forms from face of the earth.

hence, whenever possible, we should try to avoid something like that from happening again, as it might lead to the end our civilization.
 
Quote from pspr:

....
CLIMATE CHANGE IS NATURAL: 100 REASONS WHY
This is by the same organization which had it's conference paid for by big tobacco and big oil.

2009-12-15_144919.gif


You can't possibly be supporting big tobacco and big oil and their position in climate change issues unless you have some vested interest in those sectors
 
Quote from crash n burn:

well i know stone age wiped out most of the life forms from face of the earth.



What????


I think you need to read up a bit on the stone age.
 
Quote from tmarket:

...Most mammalian life will perish if CO2 level should rise to 80% or even 8%, so it is a pollutant by any measures.
Don't mammals exhale CO2 with every breath?

I suggest all tree hugging MMGW alarmists do their part - and stop breathing immediately.

There you go, problem solved.

NEXT!...
 
Quote from tmarket:

This is by the same organization which had it's conference paid for by big tobacco and big oil.

2009-12-15_144919.gif


You can't possibly be supporting big tobacco and big oil and their position in climate change issues unless you have some vested interest in those sectors
Evidently they can. That's what useful idiots are for. Otherwise, they wouldn't be useful idiots. It's a raison d'être kind of thing.

P.S. Good attachment. I'll be adding it to another thread.
 
Quote from crgarcia:

Diseases are also natural.

Who cares if global warming is man made or not?
Global warming is harmful to human societies and as such it must be neutralized.
Yes, disease is natural, and why is that?

And how can it be neutralized?

And what if all of this will result in more power to politicians/spacial interest etc at the expense of individuals?
 
Quote from crash n burn:

mankind knows more or is at a point it can "control and guide" mother nature

i.e. the DNA is one good example of mankind achievements regarding the topic in question.

so, global warming should be addressed for the sake of the planet stability in terms of hosting life. we should not allow another stone age or something as disturbing as that, whenever we're able to avoid it.
Man has glimpses of knowledge, i.e. man can only guess and make mistakes, i.e. man does not have all the facts, only a fraction of them.

But man is not all-knowing?
 
Quote from Gabfly1:

Evidently they can. That's what useful idiots are for. Otherwise, they wouldn't be useful idiots. It's a raison d'être kind of thing.

P.S. Good attachment. I'll be adding it to another thread.
Who benefits more from useful idiots, collectivists or individualists(elections/herd mentality etc)?
 
Back
Top