Search results

im just waiting here for you to tell me what in that article is good news for the aca. and for the 2nd time, the employer mandate has been delayed, so why are you bringing up businesses?

what's good about these numbers ricter? the prez delayed the employer mandate, so i don't think he should get to count the rise in employer based coverage as due to the ACA . an estimated 467k previously uninsured signed up through a marketplace == FAILURE. somewhere near a million...

did u even read that? "Of those who were previously uninsured but are now insured, 7.2 million gained ESI, 3.6 million are now covered by Medicaid, 1.4 million have signed up through a marketplace, while the remainder gained coverage through other sources." "Our estimates suggest that only...

*and to clarify, i shouldn't say "those who lost coverage" but "those who received cancellation letters for their policies." i don't want you trying to play semantics when what i meant is clear.

1) nothing in ur thread title or OP suggested much of anything. since you regularly spam the board with pro obama everything, I assumed you were posting this as some sort of obamacare victory. It isn't, and i wanted to make that clear. people had their coverage cancelled because of the aca...

First of all, you quoted me and brought it up, so it's a little late to say myob. second, I don't give a damn why you bank there. you just called them thieves and now are admitting that you need the services they provide. they don't work for free. you have a real comprehension problem. I...

this is unreal. and dems don't want voter id laws. this is just like them openly saying they cheat. where are all the progressives to discredit this?

so don't bank there! or at least don't bitch about it.. you think they're thieves but continue to bank there, what a tool. I know big banks suck and don't use them, i use a small local bank and pay 0 fees unless i have to use a foreign atm. and spare me the guilt trip. she's working and...

1) NO, it isn't. that's an edited version of my post. who's actually being disingenuous? 2) I call you names because I don't fucking like you. my "implications" was that you can't count ppl who lost their coverage and bought back in as newly insured and IF that was what you were implying...

1) let me give you some much needed advice ms wagner: telling people what they feel is an exercise in futility. you think i was what, happy, my plan got cancelled? It is indeed outrageous for the gubberment to pick winners and losers in a nation founded on individual liberty. 2) what do...

sure i agree with you. i would only say we don't even have to look that deeply into it. We increasingly resemble the socialist gubs of europe. obamacare is a socialist policy. the guy who wants his name on it, is a socialist. simple. :D there are of course many more reasons why obama, and...

1) so you intentionally didn't bold it to make it seem as if it was a statement. douchey move. 2) if 6 mil lost coverage due to obamacare and that is a very small fraction (ie insignificant) then what's so great about adding 7.1 mil? lol from your link: "Fewer than a million people who...

i don't "need" to do shit, twinkle toes. did you not see the word if? IF that was what you were implying. I haven't heard or read anything claiming that masses of people whose plans were cancelled, weren't buying new plans. for all i know, you're making it up.

you gotta consider the source bud. i skipped right past this initially, but commend you on the good catch. 07 data bwahaha.. the sad thing is spike believes this BLATANT LIE.

I'm not sure what you're getting at but I sure as shit didn't and don't support tarp/stimulus/qe. never did, never will.

right, it is much harder to tell people that living off of others is an undeserved blessing and that they will have to work and provide for themselves, than it is to give them what they want at the expense of others. the 'article' you posted is about an ingrate who is living off others and...

and im one of them. why? BECAUSE MY FUCKING PLAN WAS CANCELLED. whoa what a revelation, those whose plans were cancelled bt new ones. If you're implying you can count people who lost their plan BECAUSE of the aca, as newly insured, you are in fact retarded.

good thread title jem. ms wagner is probably stomping <s>her</s> its high heels. :D

good, he was right, but in the unfortunate position where being honest did him more harm than good. there is no right to opm in the US.

I know i'm such a horrible person because I think taking money from people who earn it and giving it to those who don't breeds: resentment, corruption, and a spoiled entitlement class. from the perspective of the taxpayer, this is no different than burning a % of their income.