Search results

cover 1382.5 regular papertrade

long 1381.25 experimental trade

down down down :D

short 1379.5 my regular papertrade

yes it did, but we are also in a very nice 10 point intradya trend. doesn't happen very often.

have you done it in Excel? how do you go about building a distribution based on your trades? then run a monte-carlo based on that distribution?

the lastest trade was on 15 min. i will do the experiment with 5 min chart. so the grail that you described is not every signal, it's only the ones that you think are good using your discretion?

on sideline right now. for the experiment trades i will designate them.

am i supposed to call every grail that i see on 5 min or am i supposed to be selective in taking the ones i think are better?

entry exit pnl short 1379.25 1381.00 -1.75 short 1380.50 1380.00 0.50 long 1385.50 1384.50 -1.00 short 1391.75 1385.50 6.25 short 1390.00 1391.50 -1.00 short 1388.25 1386.25 2.00 *all papertrades

cover 1386.25

short 1388.25 that's not on 5 min. btw, these 5 min calls will not count towards my regular papertrades.

lol sure why not. i may not be paying attention all the time though.

entry exit pnl short 1379.25 1381.00 -1.75 short 1380.50 1380.00 0.50 long 1385.50 1384.50 -1.00 short 1391.75 1385.50 6.25 short 1390.00 1391.50 -1.00 *all papertrades

cover 1391.5

how do you do #1 and what are you looking for to determine that it's a winner? i guess same question for #2.

your original description of grail signals did not have these testing conditions. i am papertrading to see if i am catching these signals.

you're saying that even though risk reward is the same, it's still better to make them wider because of commissions?

you mean using grails as entries? well how to you code higher lows and lower peaks?

what do you mean?