Search results

Hybridization is a dead-end process. It doesn't get you evolution, not even close. A species is a set of inter-fertile members.

What are the two species?

Too much irony. Where has your "evolution" theory produced a single confirmed instance of two species where one evolved from the other?

Often.

A scientific theory certainly does have to concern itself with interpretations of evidence. So, where is the observation that allows "evolution" to the exclusion of all competing explanations.

You can say that, but I doubt you actually live like that.

A theory is tested based on evidence that excludes available alternate explanations. On that basis, the evolution of species is still in the funny papers.

Superb.

Science breaks down around concepts of science as well.

Really? Where?

Illusion clashes with the truth all the time. Try driving down the road while watcing a movie on the DVD player.

...is inconsistent with...

Calling evolution "reasonable" is not science. Where is the specific evidence that requires such a process?

Teleologist: They say the species came about using only a negative effect or "vector" without providing any parallels where such a thing has happened elsewhere.

This confirmation is a subjective state of the scientist. All proofs by logic are incomplete, so too therefore is the scientific method on its own terms. The objective verification pursued by the scientist is only an idealism, a faith of sorts.

The next guy is also making his decrees which may conflict with mine. Retreating into the imaginary "godhood" of an infant is not what is meant by being as a child to enter the Kingdom.

You make several interesting points, but the feedback loop of causality you attribute to the self asks too much of any frail human I have ever come across.

To be in the world, not of the world.

Please, not the tired old "you are God" line of nonsense. That's old-school. Get an upgrade, at least. (Some of the poetry is well done. I'll concede that.)

Sound like a testimony of religious faith, little to do with science.