Intelligent Design is not creationism

[john dough]

Here's another link:

http://astrobiology.ucla.edu/pages/res3a.html

 

[I am...]

Quote from pattersb:

Could you provide a brief description of the peer-reviewed, and therefore most-likely correct, theories of existence?

Yes, I could. But I, and reality, are on ignore so far.

Jesus

 

[Jampilier]

Quote from 2cents:

"explanations"? dunno about that... in any event, a given scientific theory doesn't need to concern itself with alternative scientific theories... insofar as the theory is not contradicted by direct observational evidence, the "proof" resides in falsifiable predictions and relevant experiments

g'nite

A scientific theory certainly does have to concern itself with interpretations of evidence.

So, where is the observation that allows "evolution" to the exclusion of all competing explanations.

 

[Jampilier]

Quote from traderNik:

Does anyone else get the feeling that we are dealing with one person faking a discussion by using multiple aliases?

Often.

 

[ratboy88]

Quote from I am...:

Yes, I could. But I, and reality, are on ignore so far.

Jesus

your humor is divine. how did i miss this thread for so long? oh wait, i know now... john dough, 2penny, tradernicole, and ZZZzzzzz plus aliases'. :eek:

 

[2cents]

Quote from Jampilier:

A scientific theory certainly does have to concern itself with interpretations of evidence.

So, where is the observation that allows "evolution" to the exclusion of all competing explanations.

which explanations? IS, flying spaghetti monster theologies?

 

[john dough]

Quote from Jampilier:

A scientific theory certainly does have to concern itself with interpretations of evidence.

So, where is the observation that allows "evolution" to the exclusion of all competing explanations.

Z, I would think it enough that you post this bogus argument continuously under your regular alias, that you wouldn't have to start whining about it under this one, too.

 

[ratboy88]

well i'll be a monkey's uncle.

 

[2cents]

Quote from ratboy88:

well i'll be a monkey's uncle.

wldn't surprise anybody if u were caught shagging a chimp... thats for sure...

 

[Jampilier]

Quote from john dough:

If you can't produce credible affirmative proof for your assertions, other than dismissive statements, e.g., "design is self-evident" and "no way to prove or disprove chance", then your hypotheses are no more sound than a hypothesis advancing the actual existence of Middle Earth.

Too much irony.

Where has your "evolution" theory produced a single confirmed instance of two species where one evolved from the other?