Search results

This is wise, because Trump is covered in crumbs from head to toe, and it's just not possible to give him the benefit of a doubt and assume he's not been into the cookie jar. And, Hey, if it turns out after a couple years of investigation that Trump accomplishes the seemingly impossible and...

The Foundation agreed to some disclosure despite not being bound by Federal Law to disclose.. Under Federal law 501c3 filers are not required to make public the names of contributors. I know nothing of NY law in this regard. In the MOU, In anticipation of Clinton's nomination for Sec. of...

Where (How?) on Earth did you come up with this crap. Alex Jones? Don't bother to answer. You should definitely not be allowed to vote. Moderators, can we lead off this year's "insane post of the year awards thread" with HeSaidSheSaid's post above?

wrong!

You were asking Startibartfast, and he gave you the answer you were seeking, but I want to mention something else that may be of passing interest. And let me just say I can not give you a link because so far as I know Trump and those he has authorized are the only ones to lay eyes on his IRS...

Love the link! Thank you so much. And of Course is wasn't Hillary that enered into an MOU (small detail!). The Foundation files under 501(c3), as I alluded to earlier, and therefore is under no obligation to reveal donors names. But of course donors have that option. Same deal that Karl...

I'm tickling your butt and also reminding you that links are important.

Just as I thought. No link.

What is that giant sucking sound! Oooo it's a jem black hole.

link? :D [the italics and underlining are mine]

Once again, I agree, how could I not! Mingling all those wedding plans with memos about the State Departments Christmas party was pretty reckless.

You're cheating again. You obviously are on a first name basis with Oscar Meyer Weener's wife, or you wouldn't know this, you clever devil , you.

Not only do I Like It!, I really really like it!!! thanks for,posting this!

jem baby, you know i agree with you. Hillary did J-walk and damned if that ain't a crime. But you've been around the block a few times and you know prosecutors don't want to waste time on cases not likely to end in a conviction. They've got better fish to fry. In the case of our buddy...

What is the matter with you folks? Instead of using your brains, why not just go with what makes logical sense?

I agree. And I do expect they have them! It's dingleberry who thought it would be illegal for Mueller to have them without cause, while it never even crossed dingleberry's mind that there might be cause. . But of course they would have to go to court to get them and show cause. And as you...

Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think non-profit charitable agencies and organization are required under U.S. law to disclose their donors names; i've got no clue about New York Law, but why would it be different? My guess is that the rule is similar for charitable foundations. However I...

You can rest easy then. Mueller can't get his returns without probable cause. And Trump is such a straight shooter and upright guy that there couldn't possibly be probable cause. (sarcasm)

Could be. That would be determined by the integrity of the people doing the hunting.

I just wanted to comment that links are very important to maintain credibility. We all need to be careful to post links whenever we can because the internet has become a cesspool of unfounded charges and unsupportable allegations. Of course there are some thing that are so well known that no...