Search results

You have no argument. No reasoned response to any of the points raised against the groundless claims you keep trying to make . Scholars say why there is no historical Jesus. Amazing maybe but true nevertheless, no scholars of ancient times, NOT ONE of the dozens that would and could have...

You guys, really. You can't answer the points raised against religious apologist claims, so you just cast childish aspersions around. There are numerous obvious reasons why people writing tiny references 100, 200 and 300 years after the supposed life of supposed Jesus , of which writing...

Are you certain it is an absolute? In your world maybe certainty can only be an absolute but your playing verbal gymnastics won't change the fact, whether I am or you are certain of it or not. You honestly telling me Batman might not be non fictional just so you can imagine Jesus might...

My argument does no such thing. You keep making the charge, but never logically substantiate it. Just because YOU keep asking me if I'm absolutely certain, does not mean absolutes are necessary or pertinent. See?...There YOU go, demanding absolutes yet again. If I told you I was absolutely...

Non of those are historical evidence of Jesus's existence. Contents 1 <strike>New Testament writings</strike> 1.1<strike> Pauline Epistles</strike> 1.2 <strike>Gospels</strike> 1.3 <strike>The Acts of the Apostles</strike> 2 <strike>Ancient Christian creeds</strike> 2.1<strike>...

I must be certain.?? You are certain I must be certain? Or are you certain I am not?...... First off it was absolutes with you, now it's absolutes of certainty. With your head in a bucket of absolutes and certainty, how will you comprehend anything outside ? My argument is there are no...

Why do you want me to say things that don't even fit with what I have already explained?

Keep telling yourself that. Denial is all you have left. Nothing you've provided manifests the historicity of Jesus. You've reduced yourself to childishly repeating a whinge that like all your other cut & paste nonsense, still provides no historicity for Jesus.

I can say anything you like. Do you just want me to say things the way you expect to hear them? I am saying however , I would allow for the possibility of God to exist, in the same way I would allow for the possibility of Batman to exist; Fictionally. It seems you are saying you allow for...

One doesn't need to believe that God may exist to understand how God doesn't exist. God does not exist as all fictional things do not exist . 1) Batman has all the qualities of a fictional character. So does God. The claim Batman and God are fictional is substantiated in fact. 2) I am...

Constantly posting some moaning and groaning like a troll about James Dunn's frustration at the fact that there is no historical evidence to establish Jesus as an historical figure, does not establish Jesus as an historical figure. You do at least realize that much?

Numbers next to quotes...how ridiculous. They reference books..you know what... that would make your scholar just another 'bozo media whore,' according to your own standards. If there were any "methodological deficiencies", as a professional historian, your scholar wouldn't be...

I don't think you do actually see what I'm saying any more than Ricter sees what I'm saying.. I allow for the possibility of God to exist in the same way I allow for the possibility of King Midas to exist (you don't recall that Ricter?) ...or as you might allow for the possibility of Batman...

yeah you were caught with an infantile excuse bordering on the insane. But nevertheless in the end it remains a fact , no historian has at any time ever provided any historical argument that stands as historicity for a bible Jesus. Jesus IS fictional jem,.... but it doesn't matter...

You say it is a common mistake to speak in absolutes, but you keep speaking in absolutes and keep asking me to answer in absolutes. Do you really think one would have to be "All-knowing" about Batman to recognize he is a fictional figure.? Likewise, how come one would need to speak in...

You keep speaking of the very absolutes you say it is wrong to keep speaking of! If you talk about who killed Jesus, it is basically comparable to posing a question about who killed Batman, or any other fictional/mythical character. People are perfectly entitled to treat the Bible as if...

No I won't be trying that. You were caught and called out attempting to boost some support for yourself with a new screen name and now you look a complete tool, if not insane, by struggling to lie your way out. It's indicative of the insanity that keeps you from dealing with reality...

......the stamp collector's first rule for NON stamp collectors. Don't ever talk about NOT stamp collecting.

You seem to be tying yourself in knots. I asked for your answer to a straightforward question. What's the problem in giving a straightforward answer? You were saying , "Did the Jews "kill" Jesus, by voting to have him killed? Or is it still technically the Romans who did it?" Jews...