Search results

If you've nothing to say, why not just say nothing.

Someone whose beliefs lean against preconceived notions ignoring all else, would make a comment like that.

People who believe in a Creator ARE believing in things contrary to scientific understanding. There is NO science in any propositions for a Creator. Constantly trying to suggest otherwise is just farcical. All you ever do is invent your own versions of what you consider is current...

The problem with that is, with science, true science, you have to support assertions with hard empiric evidence. Just saying they have 'plausible SCIENTIFIC explanations' isn't necessarily science. There is no real scientific evidence to support any of the things you've mentioned. If you...

Nowhere have I ever presumed nor said anyone should do any such thing. So what compels you to keep making that kind of spurious statement, almost invariably against only those who rebut the types of anti-science arguments creationists use? You act like one, you talk like one, you make...

Thing is the majority of your posts indicate you are no such thing. My argument with you is there are those who, like creationists, prefer to insinuate all belief is the same , all theory is the same, and therefore stretch that to arguing their belief and their theories are every bit as...

Nowhere have I ever said I have proof life came from non life. I have said it is proven that the essential building blocks of life can and do come from inorganic material. The scientific study of how life on earth would have originated by that means or others within that scope is...

That's only because you're a creationist.

It's amazing. You dissemble to such a degree, you've talked youself into believing I "claimed proof of abiogenesis". You don't understand a thing about this. I've said a dozen times or more that the essential chemical elements of life - the building blocks which all life requires, can/do...

Well you've just about distorted and misrepresented what science and scientists say, so no surprise you do the same with me. Still, it is what keeps you so utterly misinformed.

Are you trying to develop your own particular brand of gobbledegook? Bottom line is your God is not going to fit because you try and misrepresent science in the hope of squeezing it in there.

You're obviously too thick to appreciate the point, whereas the Catholic Church is too deviant.

When you misrepresented Christian de Duve, that was not me lying. If you play golf anything like you try to construct an argument, I suggest you take up knitting.

Your link is to Access Research Network They are creationists .....search it Here I'll do it for you... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Access_Research_Network If you start reading stuff that suggests evolution is wrong, not proven, or is " ONLY a theory", it's likely a creationist or...

You have your answer. Why don't you stop trolling around.

It's your sentence. "when a male pervert becomes a priest and molests a boy... he is a pedophile and a homosexual" ....... priest. You said it, or rather you didn't, by the time you'd got to the end of your sentence, you'd neglected the full description. The Catholic Church, like you...

You haven't engaged because you can't. Your religon keeps getting in the way of the science. Is it understood and proven the critical components for biological life can and are formed from inorganic material? Yes. Is every step of the process understood and proven? no. What you're...

Exactly. I noticed that in how Jem's single sentence had conveniently forgotten it by the time it finished

I don't need to provide proof of abiogenesis, so why do you keep demanding it? The science which shows how the critical molecules for life can and do occur from inorganic material is proven. You can skirt dodge and deny all you want, but it won't change the fact.

.......and a priest.