Search results

Scientists did create "mini big bangs." Big Bang is the euphemism for conditions understood to have existed just after a singularity. Just after Big Bang is called the universe.

...which shows how little you know.

A universe created by a grand poo pah is not a universe beginning from nothing crummie. I made no claims about truly knowing , all I did was make a straightforward statement and you run for cover under the word THEORY. The old strawman argument that everything is faith and belief because...

....only because you altered what was actually said.

A scientific explanation for a universe from nothing. A mythical non-explanation for a universe - not from nothing - but via some bizarre figment of imagination. And you're saying the two are the same. I understand why the lack of necessity for a mythical creator brings with it a certain...

"We provided " as in you and your other screen name ? Of course the title of the website matters. It is at least offering a clue here. Just ask yourself, how come you can't distinguish between philosophy and science, even when the title of a website you're copying from is suggesting which...

Have a clue for once, look at your link - philosophypress. Philosophy is not science. You've had this pointed out to you before. Reposting the same crap doesn't make you right. Whether they are scientists or not, those people's ideas about supernatural creators or so called fine tuning...

You make interesting points, but if I understand correctly, you're still suggesting if god did exist, evil would have to be a necessity. As far as that goes, the cards fall in favor of Epicuris, as it only re-affirms god does not have the power it is supposed to have, to not make evil a...

No it isn't crummie. One scenario is pure fiction. The other scientific, and the laws of physics allow for it. Isn’t it time you got over that dude?

You are not quoting science . You are merely copying and pasting, usually from religious websites, selected non-scientific comments attributed to scientists. You've no substantive argument at all to do with science, or what you call "design", or much of anything else for that matter. Never...

The real irony is you managed to show No God is just as plausible as God.

IMO any God worth it's salt would be able to prevent evil by not allowing it to be a necessity for species survival.

Faulty logic:p - You think a good person who falls victim to evil through no fault of their own makes a choice for evil?

It's been said before, scientists are not like your priest. A scientist's work is always subject to continuous rigorous critical analysis . Those are scientists' thoughts and comments you've posted, not their scientific work. What are you people so threatened and worried about in...

It is confirmed then, you're making a two faced argument against a straightforward statement handed to you. You find a superstitious imaginary notion as plausible as something the laws of physics allow for.

Isn’t it the things that you're liable to read in the Bible, that ain't necessarily so? A beginning from nothing universe which doesn't violate the laws of physics.....that’ll be something else altogether. Considering the aggressive anxiety portrayed in this thread against a...

Whatever problems you have with scientific hypothesis/theory/ fact/ about a universe beginning from nothing, it makes no difference. In the science that explains it , the laws of physics allow for it.

They can see that your comments are as dumb as when you first made them.

Now you want me to concede the laws of physics are a theory crummie? Gravity is a theory, does that mean you have a problem with Einstein as well as a universe beginning from nothing?

You couldn’t school a shoal of fish. I understand you are very angry because scientists know how much dark energy there is and you think they don't. Remember, the irrational ramblings you've made in links you keep referring to are locked, so they are always going to remain as dumb as...