Atheists, agnostics most knowledgeable about religion, survey says

[stu]

Quote from Trader666:

Anyone who clicks this link can see that I schooled you here:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

They can see that your comments are as dumb as when you first made them.

 

[stu]

Quote from Lucrum:

No, I never said the LAWS of physics are a theory, only that the theories are...well...theories and not laws.

Whatever problems you have with scientific hypothesis/theory/ fact/ about a universe beginning from nothing, it makes no difference.

In the science that explains it , the laws of physics allow for it.

 

[Trader666]

That's a brazen lie and you're a shameless liar.

The link clearly shows your total ignorance, where you had what scientists understand about the universe BACKWARDS.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

Quote from STUpid:

They can see that your comments are as dumb as when you first made them.

 

[Trader666]

This from the lying troll who thought that the part of the universe that scientists don't understand was the part they do understand.

Quote from STUpid:

the laws of physics allow for it.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

Whatever problems you have with scientific hypothesis/theory/ fact/ about a universe beginning from nothing, it makes no difference.

In the science that explains it , the laws of physics allow for it.

That doesn't necesarily mean it actually happened that way though, does it?

 

[jem]

beyond intelligent design

http://www.simpletoremember.com/media/a/dr_schroeder_s/

smart guy wearing a yalmulka.

This is reality now not just some some Christians you can write off by typical anti christian ad hominems.

 

[jem]

make that yarmulke

 

[Kassz007]

Quote from Trader666:

That's a brazen lie and you're a shameless liar.

The link clearly shows your total ignorance, where you had what scientists understand about the universe BACKWARDS.
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2952513#post2952513

Dude, you need to quit referencing past arguments you've had. Give it up, they're in the past. Nobody clicks on the links to some previous argument you had because nobody cares.

 

[stu]

Quote from Lucrum:

That doesn't necesarily mean it actually happened that way though, does it?

Isn’t it the things that you're liable to read in the Bible, that ain't necessarily so?
A beginning from nothing universe which doesn't violate the laws of physics.....that’ll be something else altogether.

Considering the aggressive anxiety portrayed in this thread against a straightforward statement - from downright insult through absurdities of intelligent design creationism - it's interesting isn't it, how the laws of physics allow a universe to begin from nothing, but religion can't.

 

[Lucrum]

Quote from stu:

Isn’t it the things that you're liable to read in the Bible, that ain't necessarily so?
A beginning from nothing universe which doesn't violate the laws of physics.....that’ll be something else altogether.

Considering the aggressive anxiety portrayed in this thread against a straightforward statement - from downright insult through absurdities of intelligent design creationism - it's interesting isn't it, how the laws of physics allow a universe to begin from nothing, but religion can't.

Although I have many years ago, I don't read the bible now. And I'm not sure why you keep bringing up religion, to me anyway. I'm not necesarily arguing for a creator. Although now that you mention it I don't see how that's any less plausible than your universe from nothing theory.

On the one hand you have a universe from nothing and on the other hand...a universe from...nothing.