Quote from STUpid:
it's interesting isn't it, how the laws of physics allow a universe to begin from nothing, but religion can't.
Quote from Ricter:
You no doubt saw the recent reports on the scientists creating "mini big bangs"? Interesting implication.
Quote from jem:
as I read more about this I am amazed...
do you realize a quote I gave you earlier was from the guy who got this whole argument started...
"It is, for example, impossible for evolution to account for the fact than one single cell can carry more data than all the volumes of the Encyclopedia Britannica put together.â
âIt now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design.â
-Anthony Flew
Professor of Philosophy, former atheist, author, and debater"
"Mr. Flew's best-known plaint for atheism, "Theology and Falsification," was delivered in 1950 to the Socratic Club, chaired by none other than C.S. Lewis. This paper went on to become the most widely reprinted philosophical publication of the last five decades and set the agenda for modern atheism.
Now, in a remarkable reversal, Mr. Flew holds that the universe was brought into being by an infinite intelligence.
"What I think the DNA material has done is show that intelligence must have been involved in getting these extraordinarily diverse elements together," he said. "The enormous complexity by which the results were achieved look to me like the work of intelligence."
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/converted-to-creation-antony-flew-former-atheist.htm
Now remember if you have a problem with the quote... disect the quotes... not the website. these quotes can be found in lots of places.
Quote from Free Thinker:
just how much do you think an elderly Professor of Philosophy knows about dna and genes?
we are making progress. i used to spend a lot of time with christians debating "special creation". now the debate has moved to did god design evolution. you are being slowly dragged into the 20th century.
"Actually, I find no conflict here, and neither apparently do the 40 percent of working scientists who claim to be believers. Yes, evolution by descent from a common ancestor is clearly true. If there was any lingering doubt about the evidence from the fossil record, the study of DNA provides the strongest possible proof of our relatedness to all other living things". By Dr. Francis Collins
Special to CNN Editor's note: Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., is the director of the Human Genome Project. His most recent book is "The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief." http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/04/03/collins.commentary/index.html
It is confirmed then, you're making a two faced argument against a straightforward statement handed to you.Quote from Lucrum:
Although I have many years ago, I don't read the bible now. And I'm not sure why you keep bringing up religion, to me anyway. I'm not necesarily arguing for a creator. Although now that you mention it I don't see how that's any less plausible than your universe from nothing theory.
On the one hand you have a universe from nothing and on the other hand...a universe from...nothing.