Search results

I'm going to finish out the day by plotting 50% levels, for reasons which will become clear once I've posted the charts. In keeping with the post I quoted above, I make no recommendations with regard to entries, exits, or any of the rest of it. I'm merely pointing out a phenomenon that Wyckoff...

Given how quick they are to outrage (it's a daily occurrence now) and their fondness for conspiracy theories, can you blame him?

If it's that simple, everyone ought to be playing it correctly and the success rate should be 100%. Instead, that's close to the failure rate.

Unfortunately, he attracts the wrong kind of followers.

This bears repeating. I posted these charts as I did, without reference to potential entries, exits, stops, targets, whatever, to show (again) what the purpose of observation is. If for example one doesn't know what a failure looks like, much less what the relative importance/unimportance is of...

The profit lies in knowing what to do in either case.

And what times might these accounts have been posted?

Maybe. It does sound a bit like a cry in the dark . . . :)

Not sure why this is being brought up now anyway. It's a month old, and several sites have pointed out the poor wording. Even Pew acknowledges it. But righties do tend to latch onto the headlines and jump to conclusions (like the "unarmed" cop in Paris) rather than do any digging into the...

Guns.com: Critics say poll showing growing public support for gun rights ‘flawed’ “Pew’s question presents one side emphasizing the protection of individual rights versus restricting gun ownership. The question’s implicit and incorrect assumption is that regulations of gun sales infringe on gun...

Just to clarify . . . I'm well aware of the fact that my approach is not for you. That's why I've never posted anything about it here. In fact, I never posted here at all until the hijacking got out of control. I've seen a lot of decent efforts get abandoned because people wander off into left...

I don't run. I amble.

Then there's jem, who has zero integrity and gives Christians a bad name. Fair's fair.:)

Gee, I wonder why . . .

Intellectual rigor is not a value among righties (for example . . . )

I don't mean anybody in particular. I am, however, suggesting that unless one knows the trader's plan and can verify whatever claims are made on his own (the fact that a trader has a plan does not necessarily mean that he can follow it), he'd best take whatever is said with the aforementioned...

Surely there is at least one rightie who can explain at least some of the problems with the little playlet in the OP.

Relevance?