Search results

Jem you are a lying sack of shit. The atmospheric models did not fail. Actually they did very well.

As opposed the old chart jerm has so dutifully reposted from LOLWUWT, this chart is the latest science from the most authoritative source, NOAA. Again, one can see that the rate of heat gain increased around 1999. Jem, you should be ashamed of yourself. You lying sack of shit.

TEMP IN TOP HALF OF WORLD'S OCEANS ARE NOT CLIMBING FAST ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR STALLED AIR TEMPS Yes, it's possible that they aren't or they may be wrong. It's just one study. One study is a not the final word. Frankly, I think they are wrong. The other possibility is that solar has gone...

Scientists probably have significantly underestimated how much the world’s oceans have warmed since the 1970s, according to a new study. The finding may force researchers to revise their gauges of some climate change effects, including the rate of sea-level rise. The study, by Paul J. Durack of...

Either the heat went into the ocean or solar was reduced or both. Those are the only options.

The abyss is the very deep part. The upper level is where the heat went. Why you are having so much problem with such a simple concept I do not know. Note, in the chart above how the rate of heat increase increased around 98. There also may have been less heat due to aerosols reflecting the...

The heat has gone into the ocean. It may be a mystery to NASA but it not to NOAA. There is new data that has just come out. See DB's article.

No, it's not a mystery. The heat has gone into the oceans. The recent article DB posted speaks to this. There is more heat going in the oceans then we realized. There may also have been some reduction in solar due to more stratospheric aerosols mostly from dirty coal burning in China and India.

Do you have a problem with the four most authoritative sources of climate information in the world? http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/

What the hell are babbling about now? The one chart is ocean heat and the other is air temps.

In fact, if one looks at the chart of ocean heat content above, one can see an increase in rate starting around '98.

No. They are not expected to be exactly proportional. Natural variations of course will result in something other than a smooth line. The air is just a small fraction of the earth's heat.

Coauthor Felix Landerer of JPL noted that during the same period warming in the top half of the ocean continued unabated, an unequivocal sign that our planet is heating up.

"I apologize if I misled anyone." Ha ha ha, that's funny. As if suddenly you are interested in telling the truth. LOL Oh yeah, you're a reasonable guy....who just happens to deny basic climate science. LOL

Increases of CO2 causes warming, not cooling.

Yes, CO2 is still a ghg. It still has certain physical properties. Maybe you need to reeducate yourself on what a ghg is and does. Try Googling it. And Hansen recommends a tax on carbon. Not cap and trade.

American Geophysical Union "Human‐induced climate change requires urgent action. Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes." (Adopted 2003, revised and reaffirmed 2007, 2012...

You seem to be the only one obsessing over Judy Garland. Why is that?

And yet, your statement that most of them did not have not have jobs is still BULLSHIT. Isn't that funny.

To quote lucrum.......BULLSHIT