Climate Change

[DHOHHI]

Actually I've never brought it up.

I find it interesting that at least some of those who fancy themselves to be intelligent, after running out of cogent arguments, will for some reason invoke Judy Garland, as though this has some relevance to the subject under discussion.

But then the junior-high mind is characteristic of so many rightwing zealots. It's the only type of mind that could come up with some link of some sort between Judy Garland and climate change.

If I have a junior high mind then yours must be that of a 2 year old. When proven wrong on topics you always continue to argue, especially on school issues and high poverty situations.

And rant about right wingers all you want .... it's YOU who posts from Salon & Huff Post and seemingly have no other sources of information.

 

[dbphoenix]

If I have a junior high mind then yours must be that of a 2 year old. When proven wrong on topics you always continue to argue, especially on school issues and high poverty situations.

And rant about right wingers all you want .... it's YOU who posts from Salon & Huff Post and seemingly have no other sources of information.

And Judy Garland is relevant to all of this in what way?

 

[Spike Trader]

Should this act be any less vile . . . because the article appeared on Huffpo ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GOP Congressman Violated Rules By Filming Campaign Ad At Veterans Cemetery.


WASHINGTON -- Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said he is pulling an ad touting his support for veterans, after state officials in charge of the veterans cemetery where it is was filmed said the rules prohibit the filming of political ads there.

The 30-second spot highlights the congressman's support for Honor Flights, which bring World War II and other veterans to Washington to visit the memorials, and his outrage over mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

"We're going to honor our veterans for their service to our country," says Cramer in the ad.


But part of the ad, according to Watchdog.org, takes place in the North Dakota Veterans Cemetery in Mandan. August Honeyman of the North Dakota National Guard told the site that candidates are not allowed to film political spots at the cemetery.

"The answer is no, they cannot do it," Honeyman said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/06/kevin-cramer-veterans_n_5940942.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

 

[piezoe]

As I said, jem has at least a dozen threads where you can pursue this. Please do so.

Thank you for the suggestion but I think I've made my position clear already.

One of the things about your stance on this issue that I find hard to understand myself is your apparent support for cap and trade in spite of the central issue on which cap and trade is predicated having been disproven. Cap and trade is predicated on the Hansen Hypothesis being correct, not global warming, per se, and not the issue of whether man is affecting his own climate, per se. Making the distinction is essential if cap and trade is to make any sense.

 

[futurecurrents]

Thank you for the suggestion but I think I've made my position clear already.

One of the things about your stance on this issue that I find hard to understand myself is your apparent support for cap and trade in spite of the central issue on which cap and trade is predicated having been disproven. Cap and trade is predicated on the Hansen Hypothesis being correct, not global warming, per se, and not the issue of whether man is affecting his own climate, per se. Making the distinction is essential if cap and trade is to make any sense.

Yes, CO2 is still a ghg. It still has certain physical properties. Maybe you need to reeducate yourself on what a ghg is and does. Try Googling it. And Hansen recommends a tax on carbon. Not cap and trade.

 

[dbphoenix]

Thank you for the suggestion but I think I've made my position clear already.

One of the things about your stance on this issue that I find hard to understand myself is your apparent support for cap and trade in spite of the central issue on which cap and trade is predicated having been disproven. Cap and trade is predicated on the Hansen Hypothesis being correct, not global warming, per se, and not the issue of whether man is affecting his own climate, per se. Making the distinction is essential if cap and trade is to make any sense.

Yes, you have. Many times. Do you have anything new to add?

(Incidentally, I've never mentioned cap-and-trade)

 

[Lucrum]

No , its like you ogling over pictures of animals in a sexual act.

Except unlike you I never asked for any such pics

lol luke , show me a pic of you cleaning your gun in your basement area,
while masturbating.

 

[Lucrum]

Yes, you have. Many times. Do you have anything new to add?

Do you or fagcunts?

 

[dbphoenix]

Should this act be any less vile . . . because the article appeared on Huffpo ?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

GOP Congressman Violated Rules By Filming Campaign Ad At Veterans Cemetery.


WASHINGTON -- Rep. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.) said he is pulling an ad touting his support for veterans, after state officials in charge of the veterans cemetery where it is was filmed said the rules prohibit the filming of political ads there.

The 30-second spot highlights the congressman's support for Honor Flights, which bring World War II and other veterans to Washington to visit the memorials, and his outrage over mismanagement at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

"We're going to honor our veterans for their service to our country," says Cramer in the ad.


But part of the ad, according to Watchdog.org, takes place in the North Dakota Veterans Cemetery in Mandan. August Honeyman of the North Dakota National Guard told the site that candidates are not allowed to film political spots at the cemetery.

"The answer is no, they cannot do it," Honeyman said.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/06/kevin-cramer-veterans_n_5940942.html?utm_hp_ref=politics

It's pandering, regardless of who did it or where it was posted. But it has nothing to do with climate change, so please don't play into Doh!'s effort to derail the thread, as is his usual wont.

 

[piezoe]

(Incidentally, I've never mentioned cap-and-trade)

... I apologize if I misled anyone. My sentence was clumsily worded. I meant to suggest that one could imply from your posts that you would favor some means of putting restrictions on CO2 emissions. As Cap and Trade is the currently promoted mechanism for doing that, I used it as it a stand-in for whatever mechanism you might favor to reduce CO2 emissions. This was sloppy writing. I should have been more accurate.