Zzzz.. IQ level

[jorgeamado88]

James, these guys are a bunch of four-year-olds, you're quite right.

 

[james_bond_3rd]

Quote from traderNik:

If this reply weren't so fucking bizarre, I'd think it was a joke.

You are questioning my reading comprehension??? Did you even read the post you quoted??

What part of

"Do you think it's all right that the troll suggested that a fellow ET member's children might be subjected to pedophilic attack and rape"

don't you understand, James? What in the fuck does this have to do with whether or not Z agrees with me?

Second, you initially posted in agreement with the member who said Z was being flamed because his opinions weren't kosher.

Hap posted and informed you of Z's monstrous behaviour.

You then replied and said ok, so he did bad things, that doesn't give you guys the right to do bad things in return.

So I'll ask you again - WHICH IS IT?

If you still feel Z is being flamed because he disagrees with us, why did you post this, which indicates that you understand he is being flamed for his despicable behaviour??????



Sheesh....

This is worse than 4 year olds. Four year olds can be caught. You're refusing to be taught.

Let me repeat it, slowly, and expand the explanation. Hopefully you'll finally understand.

1. You flamed Z because he disagrees with you. The "He did it first" excuse was just that, an excuse. I haven't seen you guys flame anyone else who crossed the line but were politically in agreement with you.

2. I am not going to argue whether Z did or did not do the bad things that you claimed he did. He can be banned again if he violates the rules of this forum. But even if he did, that does not give you the excuse to cross the line yourselves.

Was that slow enough for you to understand now?

 

[james_bond_3rd]

Quote from traderNik:

I'll attack you if you post garbage, like you just did.

You know the interesting thing? Your post in reply to me was a classic bit of Z-ism. You completely ignored the point of my questions (Z's cowardly statements about hap's kids, and your apparent about-face, at first claiming that Z was being attacked solely because he disagreed then changing your tune to "he might have crossed the line but it doesn't give you guys the right to cross the line" ). Instead, you simply RESTATED your original argument with some ad hominem thrown in.

Hmmm... now who is the expert at that?

If you start to respond to us using pictures of rabbits...

Where is your sense of humor?

 

[jorgeamado88]

Quote from traderNik:???????

At first you say that it's categorically true that he is flamed because his opinions don't match up with others. Then you are provided with proof to the contrary. Then you change your story and say that yes, his views are objectively despicable and that he crossed the line, but that doesn't give us the right to cross the line.

Are you an utter and complete idiot, traderNik? THERE WAS ABSOLUTELY NOT AN INCH OF PROOF IN HAPABOY'S POST! Proof would have been a link or something. It was just hearsay.

I'm amazed - are you still in kindergarden? I though you guys were doing debating championships in school? Oh wait. Yes, you do. And what you learn there is rhetorical tricks, not proper argumentation technique.

 

[jorgeamado88]

Quote from traderNik:
wow, really??

I did not know that.

Ok James... there's your boy. Three bannings, and all because people don't agree with his opinions, right?

Yep, right.

I guess since Pabst posts something, it constitutes PROOF in your world. Oh yeah, Colin Powel had PROOF of WMDs as well. lol

 

[jorgeamado88]

Quote from Longhorns:
Fuck off ZZZparasite. You haven't posted under this username in almost 2 years....keep it that way.

You are a lonely loser. Get off the internet and get a life.

You're quite the loser, Longhorns, for getting agitated on an anonymous internet forum... That's what all you trolls have in common actually; you get veeery agitated. Don't you have real lives?

 

[jorgeamado88]

Quote from Holmes:
another Zzzzz... sympathiser, using the ignore button again.

Thanks, Holmes, you made my day there. I though people like you preferred attacking, namecalling and trolling everyone you disagree with instead of using ignore. On second thoughts, I am suprised you know how to use it. But then again, it would have to be a necessity for you to continue on Chit Chat and Politics & Religion - there's just too much scum out there for you. Perhaps you should look elsewhere? Oh, such a shame that you can't answer me because you've chosen to ignore me... I'll live on, I can assure you.

 

[jorgeamado88]

Quote from james_bond_3rd:Where is your sense of humor?

To me it seems like most Republicans on this board have no sense of humour. At least the ones patrolling this part of ET.

 

[Holmes]

OK guys, I have gotten a pretty good idea of where everyone stands and I am asking the moderator to close the thread.

Thanks to all those who have voted and I'll leave making any conclusions to yourself. (Otherwise I may start another flame war :eek: )

Holmes

 

[Longhorns]

Quote from jorgeamado88:

You're quite the loser, Longhorns, for getting agitated on an anonymous internet forum... That's what all you trolls have in common actually; you get veeery agitated. Don't you have real lives?

Take ZZZ's cock out of your mouth and get back to work at the dry cleaners...I want my shirts ready by 5:00pm.