Quote from dddooo:
A non-violent fight could quickly lead to the establishment of a palestinian state (23rd arab state) alongside Israel but this is not what it is all about. Their explicitly stated objective is NOT the existence of a palestinian state but the destruction of Israel. Non-violent methods are quite useless in this respect.
Yep.
The predominant psychological influences on either side do not permit the kind of insight and mental freedom required to ameliorate the situation.
There is not much thinking allowed outside the "box".
And this leads to the piling up of coffins.
Yet anyone interested in peace needs to go beyond even non-violent protest.
Protest while casting stones of blame will fall short of protest where there is no blame game.
The world is not what it appears to be.
It hides subliminal streams of thought.
There is constant communication between
what appear to be private minds with opposing agendas.
If ever the communication were exposed,
it would be seen that there is no one to blame.
It's challenging for reactionaries to understand the
nature of the laws of thought.
What happens on the ground is a charade.
All parties involved are doing this to themselves.
To answer the question "Why", the reactionaries must
move beyond the narrow confines of the conventional wisdom,
and/or religio thought processes.
To answer the question 'why' requires a violation of standard religious sentiment.
The solution to the problem requires 'blasphemous' considerations.
Until the mind is given freedom to consider 'blasphemous' thoughts without fear of recrimination,
the violence will continue it's cycles.
The solution for those who must see it on the news or hear about it,
is to be 'passerby'.
It does not help to take sides, and to join in the blame game.
It does help to see through the situation, let it go and move on.
Take our Father for example.
Since there is no one to blame,
our Father does not even see the situation.
He does not think about it, nor acknowledge it.
Guilt is a myth.
It is not possible for there ever to be a reason to condemn.
He does not condemn the blameless.
He simply does not condemn at all, ever.
Thus, all parties who ever believed in guilt,
are required to give it up, and forgive.
That is, if they ever want to return to their original Homeland.
Jesus