Zimmerman's Prosecutors Withheld Evidence

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Thsi kind of blind, unreasoning hatred is why it's useless to even debate these morons. He hasn't even considered the possibility that Zimmerman could be telling the truth about every aspect of this incident. He just wants someone's life ruined because ..why? They killed a black person. This si what a lifetime of PC brainwashing gets you.

Of course, he has an excuse. What's the state of Florida's excuse? They are trying to railroad a guy to placate race hustlers and violent mobs. That gives you a lot of confidence in the justice system.

The judge has already ruled that bogus voice analysis tesitmony the state wanted to offer would be excluded on the ground that it was not scientifically credible. So we see they are not interested in justice and truth, only in producing a body to buy off Sharpton and Jackson and the other thugs.

That's a fact! And as I've noted before, had the little thug been a white boy, the shooting would have simply been a blip on the 11:00 news. This PC shit is ripping America to pieces.:(
 
AAA poster really you talk about race. You think is race. Do you forget so many lies George tell? Why does George say he is screaming in the 911 tape (and) say Trayvon cover his mouth and nose to smother? When detective Serino ask George how does he scream and have his nose and mouth covered too, George do not have answer. Go listen to the interview with Serino.
George lie again and again and again in the interviews on the tapes.
Why does George lie so much? He lie, his wife lie. Fact.
 
Quote from AK Forty Seven:

Tonight on Hannity and in this article they say the jury can convict of lesser charges such as manslaughter.


http://gma.yahoo.com/george-zimmerm...art-trial-123348738--abc-news-topstories.html

"To prove second-degree murder, prosecutors must prove that Zimmerman was filled with ill-will, hatred or spite," said criminal defense attorney Mark Eiglarsh, who has no connection to the case. "Jurors can consider a lesser charge of manslaughter if they think what Zimmerman did was unlawful but didn't contain those necessary elements."

There are other articles which stated that the prosecutor must allow the jury to consider lesser charges. Have the prosecutors in this case filed to allow consideration of lesser charges? The last media reports I read stated they have not. Has this changed?
 
I want someone to explain the law of USA to me. You have rights to own property. You have communitys too. The communitys is many people live together and do not own property.
This is where George Zimmerman live. George choose to live in this community and not to buy his own land. He do not own this land. He live on this land with many people. So why is George "suspicious" of people walking in the rain? Why? This is "community" of many people. George do not own that land to be so suspicious of Trayvon walking in the rain. This is not George's property to protect with his gun. This is community with many people. George is not the police.

"Defense lawyers will portray Mr. Zimmerman as a dutiful watchman for a condominium development who, on the rainy night of Feb. 26, 2012, spied an unfamiliar young man with the hood of his sweatshirt pulled up, began to follow him and wound up shooting him dead out of fear that he himself would be killed. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/u...n-emotions-still-raw.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
 
Quote from trendlover:

I want someone to explain the law of USA to me. You have rights to own property. You have communitys too. The communitys is many people live together and do not own property.
This is where George Zimmerman live. George choose to live in this community and not to buy his own land. He do not own this land. He live on this land with many people. So why is George "suspicious" of people walking in the rain? Why? This is "community" of many people. George do not own that land to be so suspicious of Trayvon walking in the rain. This is not George's property to protect with his gun. This is community with many people. George is not the police.

"Defense lawyers will portray Mr. Zimmerman as a dutiful watchman for a condominium development who, on the rainy night of Feb. 26, 2012, spied an unfamiliar young man with the hood of his sweatshirt pulled up, began to follow him and wound up shooting him dead out of fear that he himself would be killed. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/u...n-emotions-still-raw.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0
You really don't know anything, do you?

It doesn't matter if you are a home owner or a renter/leasee as far as criminal law is concerned. And, it doesn't matter if some of your neighbors own or rent their homes either. That has absolutely nothing to do with this case.

And, you are making statements that don't make sense. Zimmerman didn't spy on Trayvon, he followed and observed him. That is not illegal to do. After Trayvon apparently assaulted him and was beating his face and head as he sat on top of him, any reasonable person would consider his life at risk at that point. Zimmerman just did what he had to do to protect himself from severe injury or possible death. That's called self-defense. It's legal to defend yourself in this country with deadly force in that situation.
 
Quote from trendlover:

I want someone to explain the law of USA to me. You have rights to own property. You have communitys too. The communitys is many people live together and do not own property.
This is where George Zimmerman live. George choose to live in this community and not to buy his own land. He do not own this land. He live on this land with many people. So why is George "suspicious" of people walking in the rain? Why? This is "community" of many people. George do not own that land to be so suspicious of Trayvon walking in the rain. This is not George's property to protect with his gun. This is community with many people. George is not the police.

"Defense lawyers will portray Mr. Zimmerman as a dutiful watchman for a condominium development who, on the rainy night of Feb. 26, 2012, spied an unfamiliar young man with the hood of his sweatshirt pulled up, began to follow him and wound up shooting him dead out of fear that he himself would be killed. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/u...n-emotions-still-raw.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0


Jem . . . you're an attorney right?

help the Lady out will you.:(.
 
Quote from pspr:


Zimerman didn't spy on Trayvon, he followed and observed him. ]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Why? Trayvon is only walking in the rain. Trayvon is not on the property George own. Trayvon is not doing crime. George say he "feel suspicous" but George NEVER tell the 911 he see crime. George NEVER say he see crime. George only say he "suspicious"
George is want to be the police. George HAVE NO RESPECT for the rights of other people to walk in the community. George is suck up to authority and have no respect for freedom.
 
Quote from pspr:


Zimerman didn't spy on Trayvon, he followed and observed
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So tell me what is difference to spy or to follow and observe?
You justify George Zimmerman abuse of freedom of people. George Zimmerman is big pussy with the gun. George pretend his is police.
 
Quote from trendlover:

I want someone to explain the law of USA to me. You have rights to own property. You have communitys too. The communitys is many people live together and do not own property.
This is where George Zimmerman live. George choose to live in this community and not to buy his own land. He do not own this land. He live on this land with many people. So why is George "suspicious" of people walking in the rain? Why? This is "community" of many people. George do not own that land to be so suspicious of Trayvon walking in the rain. This is not George's property to protect with his gun. This is community with many people. George is not the police.

"Defense lawyers will portray Mr. Zimmerman as a dutiful watchman for a condominium development who, on the rainy night of Feb. 26, 2012, spied an unfamiliar young man with the hood of his sweatshirt pulled up, began to follow him and wound up shooting him dead out of fear that he himself would be killed. "
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/09/u...n-emotions-still-raw.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

I want you to explain how you were allowed to move to America.
 
Back
Top