Based on the question from the jury asking for clarification on the definition of manslaughter, it appears the jury is no longer considering the murder charge.
Watching coverage on TV now.
Watching coverage on TV now.
I don't think jurors are allowed to read ET, or if they do, they are hiding the fact because they would be booted from the jury.Quote from Spike Trader:
all kinds of things are said right here on ET , won't that taint the case ?
Since we've had a president and Attorney General who are willing to interject themselves into such matters because of race.since when did judge and jury start listening to anyone but the evidence produced in court.
That was to be expected about murder 2. If they are asking for this definition, though, they either haven't examined the issue of self-defense yet or they are deviating from Florida law (which they can do) and want to justify to themselves why they will find Zimmerman guilty of manslaughter.Quote from gwb-trading:
Based on the question from the jury asking for clarification on the definition of manslaughter, it appears the jury is no longer considering the murder charge.
Watching coverage on TV now.
Quote from pspr:
Other words for profiling = common sense.