Has someone who has been around the real estate market for a long time answer this for me? I have not been able to find the answer myself on the 'net.
It seems to me that I recall when I was young that a lot of the larger houses went begging due to high interest rate mortgages, high cost of upkeep & high taxes/assessments with a higher overall tax rate.
If I'm not mistaken I recall something about larger homes being cheaper on a per square foot basis than smaller homes.
What we saw in the latest real estate runup was a premium placed upon larger homes. In other words, a 2000 sf home might go for $225/sf. A 3000 for $275/sf and a 4000 for $325/sf (usu new constr).
But I seem to recall the opposite happened back then. Because of cost concerns, the larger homes were cheaper on a square foot basis (but still overall more expensive). So, a 2000 sf home at $225/sf, but a 4000 sf home for $200/sf.
Does anyone remember this happening, or am I just wrong?
It seems to me that I recall when I was young that a lot of the larger houses went begging due to high interest rate mortgages, high cost of upkeep & high taxes/assessments with a higher overall tax rate.
If I'm not mistaken I recall something about larger homes being cheaper on a per square foot basis than smaller homes.
What we saw in the latest real estate runup was a premium placed upon larger homes. In other words, a 2000 sf home might go for $225/sf. A 3000 for $275/sf and a 4000 for $325/sf (usu new constr).
But I seem to recall the opposite happened back then. Because of cost concerns, the larger homes were cheaper on a square foot basis (but still overall more expensive). So, a 2000 sf home at $225/sf, but a 4000 sf home for $200/sf.
Does anyone remember this happening, or am I just wrong?