Is the options-market really a zero-sum game, or are there, for instance, institutions or other participants that "give away" that little edge which make some win, say, 55% of the time just because they for example need to hedge a large portfolio (or any other reason..)?
What Iâm trying to say is that, are there not participants who take on positions just to protect another position, and really don't care what the outcome of that options-position is as long as they have secured the portfolio, or whatever, thereby giving some other participant an "edge-opportunity â ?
Hmm, itâs a bit difficult to express exactlyâ¦
Anyone get my point? Thanks..
What Iâm trying to say is that, are there not participants who take on positions just to protect another position, and really don't care what the outcome of that options-position is as long as they have secured the portfolio, or whatever, thereby giving some other participant an "edge-opportunity â ?
Hmm, itâs a bit difficult to express exactlyâ¦
Anyone get my point? Thanks..
)
i'm absolutely not questioning the fact of zero-sum, I justed asked whether or not there are those who basically take on losing postions because they simply do not care as they are merely hedging etc...