Quote from Swish:
For the life of me, I don't see why people are so committed to calling trading a "zero sum game"......
Or "worse than zero sum" due to commissions, etc.
If the market had a total fixed value, then yes, I would be convinced it is zero sum - BUT clearly it is not. Because of the longer term appreciating characteristic of the market, then (theoretically), a single share of stock could be historically owned by successive folks who each made money on their ownership - hence it's not zero sum.
My gripe on the whole concept is naysayers who throw potshots at the daytrading industry.
Has anyone ever seen a serious discussion of the zero sum game on this board, in a magazine, etc.????
Thanks,
Swish
I think its important that traders understand the basics of the "zero sum" concept as another sobering reminder people are ready to kick your ass and take your money and that money does just not go to "money heaven". Options and futures are probably more pure "zero sum" plays than stocks are. The time taken to debate and vision how more pure zero sum they are relative to each other could be better spent.
Along that line of a sobering slap in the face, people ready to take your money, etc is an article I read a while back....here is a link.
http://www.turtletrader.com/zerosum.pdf
No, its not a turtletrader document, although the link was there. It was written by a USC professor, all in all a pretty good read.