Youtube shooter

[Slartibartfast]

That's the sole reason I own a firearm. "When seconds count, the police are only minutes away!"

And he wants to murder someone legally he hopes someday. He reeks of the same hunger I've seen in many game hunters using large animals as a proxy for a human.

I know a lot of 'liberals' and nearly all have guns where it is legal to do so. You can see how Tsing Tao keeps mentioning the who gets to decide who is unfit thing. He knows is is for a start.

Solve the problem and respect the 2nd. Ownership of military weapons should depend of being properly trained as part of a well regulated militia or similar.

It should not be about gun manufacturers making them into boy-toys and fashion accessories for huge profits. The same skilled crafts people could be making important goods in the USA undercutting China.

 

[Poindexter]

If that woman had an AR, there is a very good chance she would have killed instead of wounding.

A skilled, motivated shooter only needs a handgun to kill dozens in a place like Youtube HQ.

If Tsing Tao or yourself were members of the state militia and extensively trained/screened I'd have no problem if you having an AR at home

Why do you think it matters what you'd "have no problem" with, paper trader?

 

[Slartibartfast]

A skilled, motivated shooter only needs a handgun to kill dozens in a place like Youtube HQ.

Why do you think it matters what you'd "have no problem" with, paper trader?

I don't actually care as you are still just an autistic virgin most likely.

I am studying your responses fake Jew.

 

[lawrence-lugar]

The shooter in an un-touched up photo

I'm trying to be attracted to her -- But she kind of looks like a guy.
Facial proportions, brow ridge, neck. Hair slightly looks like a wig.

 

[Slartibartfast]

I'm trying to be attracted to her -- But she kind of looks like a guy.
Facial proportions, brow ridge, neck.

Necrophilia also.. though @Poindexter might like a go on her corpse.

My buddy is offering him a real prepago, money and a weekend break from his humdrum life. No interest. Something off with that boy.

 

[Poindexter]

And he [Tsing Tao] wants to murder someone legally he hopes someday.

One can't "murder someone legally" you utter moron. Do you have a life in the real world? Posting phony trade summaries and BS accusations like this all day doesn't count.

Ownership of military weapons...

ARs aren't "military weapons."

Ownership of military weapons ...should depend of being properly trained as part of a well regulated militia or similar.

You're a paper trading blowhard from Colombia; your uninformed opinion is irrelevant.

 

[Slartibartfast]

One can't "murder someone legally" you utter moron. Do you have a life in the real world? Posting phony trade summaries and BS accusations like this all day doesn't count.

ARs aren't "military weapons."

You're a paper trading blowhard from Colombia; your uninformed opinion is irrelevant.

You can if you intentionally abuse a stand-your-ground law.

ARs are military weapons. Unless there is a form of assault hunting I've not heard of? Not being fully auto is not relevant.

You are the most perfect example of Dunning Kruger syndrome I've encountered here.

A flight, a grand spending money and a prepago to help you get past your emotional problems connected to your virginity. A fair deal no?

 

[Slartibartfast]

While is losing his shit in glee correcting me on the meaning of "AR" I'll make a post before him.

Poor little pawn.

 

[Poindexter]

You can if you intentionally abuse a stand-your-ground law.

Murder by definition is illegal. Therefore one can't "murder someone legally."

ARs are military weapons. Unless there is a form of assault hunting I've not heard of? Not being fully auto is not relevant.

The U.S. military has not, does not and will not use ARs. And selective fire is absolutely relevant. That's the primary difference between an M16 and an AR15.

You are the most perfect example of Dunning Kruger syndrome I've encountered here.

Always assume a leftist is telling the exact opposite of the truth, especially when projecting their faults, and especially when the leftist is our very own paper trading marvel, Mr. Sluttyfartbutt.

 

[Slartibartfast]

Murder by definition is illegal. Therefore one can't "murder someone legally."

The U.S. military has not, does not and will not use ARs. And selective fire is absolutely relevant. That's the primary difference between an M16 and an AR15.

Always assume a leftist is telling the exact opposite of the truth, especially when projecting their faults, and especially when the leftist is our very own paper trading marvel, Mr. Sluttyfartbutt.

Ok, you can though. Also you would have to have evidence that no military uses a semi-automatic only rifle would you not? Just I've seen it.

Can you describe way you feel when you look at this image?