YOUR Religion

What is your religion/religious heritage?

  • Christian

    Votes: 54 42.9%
  • Buddist

    Votes: 7 5.6%
  • Muslim

    Votes: 11 8.7%
  • Hindu

    Votes: 4 3.2%
  • Liberal

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • Marxist

    Votes: 3 2.4%
  • Agnostic

    Votes: 44 34.9%

  • Total voters
    126
Quote from vhehn:

there was only one time in the bible where jesus was specifically asked what it takes to enter heaven. he could have said just believe in me or just have faith. he did not. in the story he said:
Now a man came up to Jesus and asked, "Teacher, what good thing must I do to get eternal life?" "Why do you ask me about what is good?" Jesus replied. "There is only One who is good. If you want to enter life, obey the commandments." "Which ones?" the man inquired. Jesus replied, " `Do not murder, do not commit adultery, do not steal, do not give false testimony, honor your father and mother,' and `love your neighbor as yourself.'" "All these I have kept," the young man said. "What do I still lack?" Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."

Jesus also said, “Unless you become as a little child, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.” . He clearly intended His message to be simple if, after all, a child could accept it. It’s clear that Jesus’ gospel was intended to be simple enough for the poor and uneducated and He was clear that you just needed to be born again with the Holy Spirit following.

James does a nice job of summarizing, or crossing the bridge, between the Catholic and Protestant views. James essentially implied that you cannot have works without faith and faith without works. Common sense tells you that they are not two abstract, mutually exclusive and independent concepts.

Jesus also said, “Unless you repent, …” This is very in line with Pauline doctrine.

But, in all of this, you guys are (imo) missing the point. Jesus was NOT advocating some kind of formula because it was a relationship He was seeking. Christians don’t become and stay Christians because of some rule that they’ve followed but because they have a relationship with the Spirit of God.

Let me ask you a question: what are the barest rules that you can have to have a relationship with another human being? Well, it’s not that easy to come up with a formula for it. Furthermore, it would be different for every pair of human beings. You’re trying to force something full of life and force it into a clinical abstraction….
 
Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

Jesus also said, “Unless you become as a little child, you shall not enter the kingdom of heaven.” . He clearly intended His message to be simple if, after all, a child could accept it. It’s clear that Jesus’ gospel was intended to be simple enough for the poor and uneducated and He was clear that you just needed to be born again with the Holy Spirit following.

James does a nice job of summarizing, or crossing the bridge, between the Catholic and Protestant views. James essentially implied that you cannot have works without faith and faith without works. Common sense tells you that they are not two abstract, mutually exclusive and independent concepts.

Jesus also said, “Unless you repent, …” This is very in line with Pauline doctrine.

But, in all of this, you guys are (imo) missing the point. Jesus was NOT advocating some kind of formula because it was a relationship He was seeking. Christians don’t become and stay Christians because of some rule that they’ve followed but because they have a relationship with the Spirit of God.

Let me ask you a question: what are the barest rules that you can have to have a relationship with another human being? Well, it’s not that easy to come up with a formula for it. Furthermore, it would be different for every pair of human beings. You’re trying to force something full of life and force it into a clinical abstraction….
so do you hate your family?

Luke 14:26
26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot be my disciple.
 
Quote from vhehn:

so do you hate your family?

Luke 14:26
26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot be my disciple.

C'mon. Jesus tenderly took a child into his arms and chastized the disciples for not allowing the children to come to him. He kept in VERY close contact with his mother. So he obviously did not mean what you are implying.

Let me ask you this. He says that you must hate your brothers and sisters "IN THE SAME WAY" that you hate your own life. What did he mean? That will give you the answer to your question...
 
Quote from vhehn:

so do you hate your family?

Luke 14:26
26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot be my disciple.

And, by the way, I'd prefer if you responded to my posts instead of just pulling arbitrary and unrelated stuff off of infidels.org or wherever you're looking...
 
Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

C'mon. Jesus tenderly took a child into his arms and chastized the disciples for not allowing the children to come to him. He kept in VERY close contact with his mother. So he obviously did not mean what you are implying.

Let me ask you this. He says that you must hate your brothers and sisters "IN THE SAME WAY" that you hate your own life. What did he mean? That will give you the answer to your question...

are you putting your own analysis on the words that plain for all to read?
 
Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

And, by the way, I'd prefer if you responded to my posts instead of just pulling arbitrary and unrelated stuff off of infidels.org or wherever you're looking...

sorry no can do. i respond in whatever way i feel will make my point.
 
Quote from vhehn:

so do you hate your family?

Luke 14:26
26 If anyone comes to me and does not hate his father and mother, his wife and children, his brothers and sisters— yes, even his own life— he cannot be my disciple.

You point out another reason why it was very tough to get into heaven if you read the bible as handbook for behavior. Jesus as a very well versed Rabbi showed how difficult it is to merit eternal life. In fact it is probably impossible to merit heaven by being a good person because you are going to fall short of the mark. I personally think the only choice a man has -- who realizes he is not going to make it on his own - is to grab onto one of the promises God made and act in faith on a promise.

I hesitate to tell anyone that there is only one perscription for getting eternal life, smarter guys then me have come to different conclusions. The Catholic and other Orthodox chruch obviously believe that you have to seek out the grace of God and work out your salvation through the sacraments and being in Union with Gods teachings.

Protestants believe that by faith you are saved. But even a strict Pauline view is very difficult to continue to always have confidence in. It seems to me faith is not a formula. Having faith is a verb. That is what the book of James widely misread was actually saying about the works vs faith dichotomy. Faithing is really what Paul was talking about. I suspect you must have continuous faith, not just saying you believe. You may believe that Jesus died for your sins but when your fruits are not that great how do you really know you are saved. How do you deal with backsliding.

I believe the works vs soley faith connundrum is only truly understood when you conclude faith is actually a verb. To me and to the Protestant and Catholic teachers I have read there is one unifying conclusion even for a Jew. You must work or act in faith on one of Gods promises. The beauty of that belief is that on Judgement day the lawyer in me actually has something to fall back on. God might say or I might judge myself to be unworthy of heaven. But in my defense, I will say, I looked around did my best concluded that God was letting me know through the old testament that the God of Abraham is the one true God and that I could tell he was God by the fact he kept his promises. I can also say that I concluded that my Job (interesting because the book of Job was about faith) was to take God for his word and act (in faith) upon it. Acting in faith makes you righteous even if by that act it looks to others (not well studied) like you williing to do a potential heinous thing like sacrificing your first born son.

In the end what else could there be? Either a God who keeps his promises or no God at all. The choice is yours.
 
"God might say or I might judge myself to be unworthy of heaven. But in my defense, I will say, I looked around did my best concluded that God was letting me know through the old testament that the God of Abraham is the one true God and that I could tell he was God by the fact he kept his promises."

and i will say that i spent 50 years as a christian and as soon as i matured enough to look at the bible in the light of modern evidence i concluded that it was nothing more than a bunch of books written by primitive superstitious men trying to explain what they believed. as more and more why questions are answered there is less and less need for god did it answers and i could see no evidence of an active god in our lives.

how is your position any better than mine?
 
Quote from ShoeshineBoy:

I understand what you’re saying in the sense that Jesus had no formal Pauline apologetic and did sometimes mention works-related issue with respect to salvation. But Jesus very definitely mentioned a rebirth experience, the indwelling of the Holy Spirit that would follow and mentioned faith and belief every other sentence he spoke. So, again, the problem that you are going to have with this line of thought if that the greatest proponenet of being born again was Jesus Himself.

Again, that’s why all jus evangelicals and Protestants generally, feel so comfortable around each other. It’s the born again experience and belief that unites us – not theological uniformity.
Moses story - taken from earlier story (Sargon II of Akkad)
Noah story - taken from earlier story (Epic of Gilgamesh)
Jesus story - taken from earlier figures: Dionysus, Krishna, Lao Zi, Attis, Tammuz (all virgin born saviour gods w/ immortal fathers; were persecuted at birth; performed miracles; died horrible deaths; rose into heaven/ nirvana etc.
 
Quote from ShoeshineBoy:


Let me ask you this. He says that you must hate your brothers and sisters "IN THE SAME WAY" that you hate your own life. What did he mean? That will give you the answer to your question...

This was in reference to the false identifications we have embellished for ourselves...identifications that are something other than who we are. Jesus is sayin, Be Real. And the only thing real is love. If you are not love, then every other ID is an embellisment of an illusion. We are so wrapped up in these IDs they become our entire life. This is the life that he says to "hate". Keep it real. Be the love that you are. That's it.

JohnnyK
 
Back
Top