Half of it is a good story about disruptive technology and the other half is that VC is filled with progressives who couldn't turn down an investment in a company run by a woman that sounds like a tranny.
I have been following and reading about her and her company now for about a year or so, its finally making its rounds where most people are noticing the company and her...
I read the same thing you did and thought for as smart as she is, running a "billion" dollar company how could she come up with an answer like that, its seems very very questionable whats going on with that company and the value they have placed on it, we are in a the biggest bubble this world has ever seen, but of course no one is going to believe it or witness it until well after the fact it bursts like it has so previous times.....This company being valued as much as it is being valued at with not much do go on is extremely questionable, take a look at the people she hired for her board members, if that doesn't raise questions I don't know what does....
I have been following and reading about her and her company now for about a year or so, its finally making its rounds where most people are noticing the company and her...
I read the same thing you did and thought for as smart as she is, running a "billion" dollar company how could she come up with an answer like that, its seems very very questionable whats going on with that company and the value they have placed on it, we are in a the biggest bubble this world has ever seen, but of course no one is going to believe it or witness it until well after the fact it bursts like it has so previous times.....This company being valued as much as it is being valued at with not much do go on is extremely questionable, take a look at the people she hired for her board members, if that doesn't raise questions I don't know what does....
I have been following and reading about her and her company now for about a year or so, its finally making its rounds where most people are noticing the company and her...
I read the same thing you did and thought for as smart as she is, running a "billion" dollar company how could she come up with an answer like that, its seems very very questionable whats going on with that company and the value they have placed on it, we are in a the biggest bubble this world has ever seen, but of course no one is going to believe it or witness it until well after the fact it bursts like it has so previous times.....This company being valued as much as it is being valued at with not much do go on is extremely questionable, take a look at the people she hired for her board members, if that doesn't raise questions I don't know what does....
A
And news out today that this company is practically worthless...just as I thought.
....$9 billion to zero
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/4-5-billion-nothing-forbes-100000828.html
Not belittling this woman's achievement but only a tool like Cramer would declare her or any other innovator as "the next Steve Jobs.

However, I doubt she will be on welfare or food stamps even though Forbes said she is penniless (zero).Did Cramer really say that?
Well, her net worth was downgraded to zero by Forbes and Walgreens has just dropped her company, severing all ties.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2016...-voided-tests-and-possible-federal-sanctions/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthew...eranos-founder-elizabeth-holmes/#688398de2f29
From hero to zero indeed...