If her claims are true, she can run a blood test for 1/2 of what medicare reimburses doctors for (the lowest of the medical rates). That's expected to be 20Bn of savings there. I know the major lab companies are investing heavily to reduce the costs and improve the speed of blood testing. They can't get to those numbers. Those companies are customers of my day job.
Safety isn't just about reducing AIDs, but making it easier and less error prone. Taking less blood from your finger is a lot easier than finding an artery (which on an old person can cause extra pain and inconvenience - even if it's mild). If you can do the test at home (and her tests are being or will be sold at Walgreens) then further medical expenses are reduced.
And to respond to your first post against me, I never said her company was worth 9 billion dollars. I only commented that there's a lot of potential here if the hype is true.
I'm not going to engage in your trolling the way Martin did. This is my last reply to you on this topic.