Can you find any instance where I have said that racists don't have a right to their pathetic ignorant opinions, or have suggested that these miscreants aren't protected under the Constitution in holding them?
You would find the ACLU defending these racist neo nazis if for some reason their right to march, protest, or speak out their opinions were abridged.
And yes of course, your strawman argument, fallacious as it is, isn't even accurate.
I have come to expect this type of post from you and from the uneducated and unwashed masses here at ET.
You would find the ACLU defending these racist neo nazis if for some reason their right to march, protest, or speak out their opinions were abridged.
And yes of course, your strawman argument, fallacious as it is, isn't even accurate.
I have come to expect this type of post from you and from the uneducated and unwashed masses here at ET.
Quote from Pabst:
Does one not have a fundamental right to be prejudiced?
To aim the strawman argument directly at Z10, has he not repeatedly posted sexist, anti-Republican voter (regressive, trailer park denizens), and anti-Mexican immigration threads? Is that not his right?
As members of a message board that's marketed to traders, we should all recognize that free speech is a bed rock of free markets.
It would be great if all people lived in harmony. It would also be great if blacks didn't commit massive amounts of crime relative to their population, if Mexican's would drive sober, if Irish-Catholics wouldn't punch your brains out because you root against ND while sitting in a sports bar, ect.....
Alas as social groups we all have characteristics that are going to be judged by others. Either verbally or not. As long as bad words don't cause bad deeds.......