Quote from Ricter:
If true, my crazy is of vastly lesser duration than yours.
You proved you're "amazing" when you would not admit that the CO2 molecule absorbs energy at wavelengths above 4k nanometers. You proved it again when you trotted out the same "revenues rise when taxes fall" argument for the twentieth time, even after you previously admitted the action of other variables. So right back at ya. : )Quote from jem:
we are just talking about this specific crazy.
your amazing left twist and filter of all economic facts manifests a psychotic break... but we were trying to bring you back in.
Quote from Ricter:
You proved you're "amazing" when you would not admit that the CO2 molecule absorbs energy at wavelengths above 4k nanometers. You proved it again when you trotted out the same "revenues rise when taxes fall" argument for the twentieth time, even after you previously admitted the action of other variables. So right back at ya. : )
Pfft, as if Man cannot produce CO2.Quote from jem:
what are you talking about
a. temperature rise has preceded the rise and fall of CO2 buildup through out earths history. I do not doubt CO2 is like a blanket that keeps heat in... I gave you that very analogy and told you it is the temperature rise which has caused the CO2 blanket to be put on.
Quote from Ricter:
Pfft, as if Man cannot produce CO2.
Quote from jem:
as if you had no response to the fact that thorughout the earths history rising temperatures preceded the earth release CO2 and falling temperatures preceded more CO2 being absorbed or off gassed.
as if the earth does not release a lot of CO2 in response to rising temperatures