Not sure what distinction you are trying to make but if you are comparing DSL to an internet T1 (as opposed to a T1 for non-internet use, e.g. direct to a brokerage) then I don't see a big difference. Different terminating equipment on each end and different signaling but the net result is pretty much the same, IP over copper (and you can get T1 speeds using symmetrical DSL 1.5/1.5Mbps).Quote from osorico:
DSL IS NOT POINT TO POINT. At best, a DSL connection can be called stable between user and DSLAM. Nothing more. After initial connections, DSL connections are nothing similar to point-to-point.
It'll become obvious when the DSLAM a DSL line connects to needs reset or reconfiguration. Nothing to do with route. Too few DSLAMs means performance degradation. Too many DSLAM connections to a lesser backbone connection means performance degradation.
Yes a DSL ISP can over-subscribe their backhaul connections from the CO to their core network but that would affect a T1 internet user attached to the CO just as much as the DSL users. DSLAM's get reset or reconfigured but so do CSU/DSU's. Sounds like you are comparing a business class T1 to a residential DSL connection; there is business-class DSL too.
