Quote from scriabinop23:
hahah.. actually, i admit I may be mistaken. I got this crazy idea from following the original bullsnbearz advertising threads, and it seemed Jay (bullsnbearsz) went through a rapid phase of creating multiple IDs to contribute to his discussions and back them up. Reaver was amongst top aliases. Now maybe I misread something and just made a flawed assumption...
Regardless, a lot of self congratulatory talk ... with so much, I couldn't help but conclude my assumption was correct. Well then I stand corrected.
And on the original topic: unless you are a lucky SOB (with a dream of a trading system, or just had a stroke of luck in picking chains of winners), and additionally are properly capitalized to trade, you'll make a lot more $$ with a degree / climbing up the corporate ladder than you will trading.
If you don't have the discipline to complete college, the odds are you don't have the discipline to properly execute a trading system over years. The point has been well made that connections formed are more worthwhile than content learned for the vast majority of majors. Especially nontechnical majors (show me how many EEs or physicians exist without college degrees).
And of course there's an exception to every point I just stated; those are few and far between.
I have a hard time believing anyone who can actually conceive of, program/backtest a quantitative trading system *that works* has any interest in spending energy wondering or supporting the argument that a college education is unnecessary.
Because of course its not, but if you are pursuing $$$ and employment (ie work with others), its much easier by having it.