How can anyone "bail out" when terms have not been agreed? If you won't accept 3rd party verification from filed financial accounts, tax returns, established accounting firms etc, that's your problem. All it proves is that I didn't have audited separate accounts purely for daytrades. And if you are so concerned that a regulated, professional accounting firm in a major international financial center is going to lie about results, why are you willing to accept statements in electronic form - don't you think if I wanted to cheat you, I could have fake statements made up for considerably less than $75k? You are *more* likely to be ripped off by one guy sending you emailed statements, than you are by a regulated institution which has a lot more than $75k to lose if it gets caught committing fraud.
As for your promises of privacy - you publicly posted the first private message I sent you, despite me reminding you it was private, remember? You didn't even have the courtesy to PM me back. Why would I trust your word after that? Your actions demonstrated that you are an untrustworthy, dishonourable person - I guess that should come as no surprise, if your claims to be working on an investment bank trading desk are true. After the revelations of the last couple of years, we all know what kind of shenanigans go on in places like that, and the type of ethics that their employees subscribe to. Keep on doing "God's Work".
I feel that I've offered reasonable terms, given my concerns about privacy - concerns which you have amply justified by violating privacy and good faith at the first hurdle. So, if you want to go on huffing and puffing, be my guest. I actually find it quite amusing how hot under the collar you are getting about all this, and as we can see from the posts, several other ET posters find it entertaining too.
Oh and one last thing...if you are in Asia, may I hazard a guess that you are FILTHY? Failed In London, Tried Hong Kong. Now, do run along - don't you have to be at your cubicle in a few hours?
As for your promises of privacy - you publicly posted the first private message I sent you, despite me reminding you it was private, remember? You didn't even have the courtesy to PM me back. Why would I trust your word after that? Your actions demonstrated that you are an untrustworthy, dishonourable person - I guess that should come as no surprise, if your claims to be working on an investment bank trading desk are true. After the revelations of the last couple of years, we all know what kind of shenanigans go on in places like that, and the type of ethics that their employees subscribe to. Keep on doing "God's Work".
I feel that I've offered reasonable terms, given my concerns about privacy - concerns which you have amply justified by violating privacy and good faith at the first hurdle. So, if you want to go on huffing and puffing, be my guest. I actually find it quite amusing how hot under the collar you are getting about all this, and as we can see from the posts, several other ET posters find it entertaining too.
Oh and one last thing...if you are in Asia, may I hazard a guess that you are FILTHY? Failed In London, Tried Hong Kong. Now, do run along - don't you have to be at your cubicle in a few hours?
